How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
SRSWOR inclusion probabilities, pairwise nonpositive indicator covariance, and the sample mean
Example
Let , , , and let be fixed real values. Let consist of all -element subsets of , with each such sample assigned probability , where . This is simple random sampling without replacement (SRSWOR). For distinct , The Horvitz–Thompson mean reduces to the ordinary sample mean .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , a fixed finite population , and the uniform design on all -element subsets of .
Finite populations and sampling designs: For a sampling design, , , and the values are held fixed under the design law.
The Horvitz–Thompson total and mean are design-unbiased under positive inclusion probabilities: If every , the total and mean estimators with weights are design-unbiased.
Variance, standard deviation, and covariance on a finite probability space: On one finite probability space, .
Expectation is linear for every finite family of random variables, without any independence hypothesis: Expectation is linear for finite families of random variables on one finite probability space.
Indicators turn event probabilities, intersections, and finite counts into expectations and products: Indicator expectations equal event probabilities, and products of indicators equal indicators of event intersections.
The indicator random variable of an event: An event indicator is on the event and outside it.
Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space: Expectation is the finite weighted sum over sample outcomes.
Verification
Let be the number of -subsets containing a fixed unit. A permutation of taking one unit to another gives a bijection of the sample family, so every unit occurs in exactly samples. Counting pairs with in two ways gives , hence and .
Let be the number of samples containing a fixed ordered pair of distinct units. Permutations of give the same for every such pair. Counting triples with and gives , so and . This also gives when .
Put . By [F5] and [F6], and . Expanding the covariance in [F3] with linearity [F4] therefore gives .
Since , the estimator in [F2] has . Its expectation is by [F2].
Depends on
- Finite populations and sampling designs
- The Horvitz–Thompson total and mean are design-unbiased under positive inclusion probabilities
- Variance, standard deviation, and covariance on a finite probability space
- Expectation is linear for every finite family of random variables, without any independence hypothesis
- Indicators turn event probabilities, intersections, and finite counts into expectations and products
- The indicator random variable of an event
- Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.