Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The successive differences k+1−k converge to 0

Example

The sequence zk:=k+1−k converges to 0 (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals). Since (k+1−k)(k+1+k)=1, the differences are the reciprocals of the sequence wk:=k+1+k, which diverges to +∞ because wk≥k and (k) does (The square roots k diverge to +∞); the backward direction of For positive terms, null and divergence to +∞ are reciprocal then gives zk→0. Thus a difference of two sequences that both diverge can converge, so the algebra of limits has no difference rule for divergent sequences.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: For every natural k the reals k and k+1, with k+1=σ(k) (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences), and the sequences zk:=k+1−k, wk:=k+1+k.

[F1]

(k)k∈N diverges to +∞ (The square roots k diverge to +∞).

[F2]

Reciprocal bridge: for a sequence (xk) with xk>0 for every k, (xk) converges to 0 if and only if (1/xk) diverges to +∞ (For positive terms, null and divergence to +∞ are reciprocal).

[F3]

Square roots: every real a≥0 has a unique s≥0 with s2=a, written s=a (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}).

[F4]

Divergence to +∞: xk→+∞ means that for every real M there is K with xk>M for all k≥K (Divergence to +∞ and to −∞).

[F5]

Field arithmetic: every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse, and uv=1 with v the inverse of u identifies v=u−1 (Field).

[F6]

Monotonicity of squaring on nonnegatives: for a,b≥0, a<b  ⟺  a2<b2 and a≤b  ⟺  a2≤b2 (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives).

[F7]

Adding inequalities: if a<b and c<d then a+c<b+d, and translation by a constant preserves the order (Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities).

[F9]

Archimedean property: for every real x there is a natural number n≥1 with x<n⋅1R (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).

[F10]

Canonical naturals: k+1≥1 for every k, and n↦n⋅1R is strictly increasing, hence preserves non-strict order, on {1,2,3,… } (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

[F11]

Inverses of positives are positive: a>0 implies a−1>0 (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenF3F5F6F7F8F10

For every k, (k+1)2=k+1 and (k)2=k by [F3], so the product of the two factors is zkwk=(k+1−k)(k+1+k)=(k+1)−k=1 by [F5] and algebra. Moreover wk>0: both roots are nonnegative by [F3], 1≤k+1 by [F10] with 12=1≤k+1=(k+1)2 gives 1≤k+1 by [F6], and adding the nonnegative k to it preserves the inequality by [F7], so wk≥k+1≥1>0 by [F8]. Since wk≠0, the identity zkwk=1 exhibits zk as the inverse of wk by [F5].

1.2givenF3F7

For every k, 0≤k+1 by [F3]; adding k to this inequality gives k≤k+1+k=wk. Translation preserves a non-strict inequality by [F7] in the strict case and by equality otherwise.

1.3givenF3F4F6F9F10

The shifted sequence (k+1) diverges to +∞: given a real M, if M<0 then k+1≥0>M for every k by [F3]; if M≥0, [F9] gives a natural n≥1 with M2<n, and for every k≥n one has n≤k+1 by [F10], hence M2<(k+1)2; since M≥0 and k+1≥0, the equivalence of [F6] gives M<k+1. So for every real M the bound holds eventually, which is [F4].

2.1step 1.2F1F4

The sequence (wk) diverges to +∞: by [F1] the sequence (k) does, so given a real M there is K with k>M for all k≥K, and step 1.2 gives wk≥k>M there; this is the condition of [F4].

3.1step 1.1step 1.3step 2.1F1F2F5F11∎

Put xk:=1/wk. Since wk>0 for every k by step 1.1, [F11] gives xk>0 for every k, and 1/xk=1/(1/wk)=wk by [F5]. Now 1/xk=wk diverges to +∞ by step 2.1, so the backward direction of the reciprocal bridge [F2], applied to the positive sequence (xk), gives xk=1/wk→0; and zk=wk−1=1/wk by step 1.1, so zk→0. Moreover (k) diverges to +∞ by [F1] and (k+1) does by step 1.3, so zk is the difference of two sequences that both diverge to +∞ and yet converges to 0: the algebra of limits has no difference rule for divergent sequences.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources