How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Summable exceptional measures in the kolmogorov induction
Example
If measurable subsets of the normalized torus satisfy for every , then . Thus almost every point belongs to only finitely many exceptional sets.
Facts & Assumptions
A sequence of measurable sets with summable measures has null limsup, without independence The first Borel-Cantelli lemma for measures.
Verification
Given: The measurable sets and geometric measure bounds in the example.
Finite geometric cancellation gives , hence . More precisely, the tail satisfies .
F1 applies to these measurable sets and the finite sum proved in step 1.1; it gives . Equivalently, outside this null intersection, some J has the point outside every for , which is the asserted eventual good-set property. The proof of F1 bounds the limsup measure by each tail, here explicitly . No independence or choice assumption on the supplied sequence is needed.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition (standard reference, not scraped)