Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kolmogorov’s Block Construction and Almost-Everywhere Divergence: Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The block e5+e6 has exactly two nonzero coefficients. Cutoffs at four, five and six show directly how a frequency shift delays a partial sum without reducing its amplitude. Its full magnitude is 2cos(πx), which equals two at zero and zero at one half.

The second example computes the exceptional-measure total and tails. The total is one and the tail from index J is 21J. Borel–Cantelli then gives eventual avoidance outside a null set; independence is unnecessary.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)Open item page →

One finite kolmogorov frequency block

Example

For P=1+e1 and Q=e5P, the support of Q is {5,6}, A4Q=0, A5Q=e5, A6Q=Q, and Q=P.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Analytic sums and the finite coefficient convention are fixed Kolmogorov analytic partial sum maximal function.

Verification

Given: P(x)=1+e2πix and Q(x)=e10πixP(x).

1.1

Multiplication gives Q(x)=e10πix+e12πix=e5(x)+e6(x). Both coefficients are one and all others zero by the character-integral calculation in F1, so its support is exactly {5,6}. The cutoff through four is the empty supported sum, through five is e5, and through six is e5+e6=Q.

F1
2.1

Since e5(x)=1, Q(x)=1+e2πix. Factoring gives 1+e2πix=2eπixcos(πx), hence both magnitudes are 2cos(πx). At x=0 they equal two, and at x=1/2 they vanish. This concrete shift changes the frequencies while preserving every pointwise magnitude.

F1step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)Open item page →

Summable exceptional measures in the kolmogorov induction

Example

If measurable subsets Ej of the normalized torus satisfy m(Ej)2j for every j1, then m(lim supjEj)=0. Thus almost every point belongs to only finitely many exceptional sets.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A sequence of measurable sets with summable measures has null limsup, without independence The first Borel-Cantelli lemma for measures.

Verification

Given: The measurable sets and geometric measure bounds in the example.

1.1

Finite geometric cancellation gives j=1J2j=12J, hence j1m(Ej)1<. More precisely, the tail satisfies jJm(Ej)21J.

given
2.1

F1 applies to these measurable sets and the finite sum proved in step 1.1; it gives m(JjJEj)=0. Equivalently, outside this null intersection, some J has the point outside every Ej for jJ, which is the asserted eventual good-set property. The proof of F1 bounds the limsup measure by each tail, here explicitly 21J0. No independence or choice assumption on the supplied sequence is needed.

F1step 1.1

Sources