Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Surgery on a product of spheres produces a sphere in the standard framing

Example

Assume ACω, as in the surgery definition. Let 0≤p≤m−1, q=m−p, and M=Sp×Sq. Embed Sp as Sp×{y0} and frame it by the Sq-factor: use the labelled hemisphere decomposition of Sq, with y0 the pole of the removed hemisphere, to obtain a product neighbourhood Sp×Dq. Then the p-surgery along this framed sphere produces Sp+q=Sm. Separately, the standard decomposition Sm=(Sp×Dq)∪(Dp+1×Sq−1) shows that p-surgery on Sm along the standard framed Sp produces Sp+1×Sq−1: these are different p-surgeries. The inverse of the first is a (q−1)-surgery on Sm returning Sp×Sq, while the inverse of the second is a (q−1)-surgery on Sp+1×Sq−1 returning Sm.

Verification

Given: the integers 0≤p≤m−1 and q=m−p, the manifold M=Sp×Sq, the embedded sphere Sp×{y0}, and the standard decompositions of the relevant disk products.

[F1] p-surgery on a smooth m-manifold: the p-surgery replaces φ(Sp×int⁡Dq) by Dp+1×Sq−1 glued along Sp×Sq−1 by the identification induced by the framing.

[F2] The outgoing boundary of a handle attachment trades the disk factors: ∂(Dp+1×Dq)=(Sp×Dq)∪(Dp+1×Sq−1), the two sides meeting along Sp×Sq−1; the boundary of a product is the union of the products with the boundary of one factor.

[F3] Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn: The labelled double of Dn is explicitly diffeomorphic to the sphere for n≥1, by the following elementary map (not a theorem asserted by the cited definition): for x=ru in each copy, send x to (sin⁡(πr/2)u,±cos⁡(πr/2)). At r=0 the first component is (sin⁡(π∣x∣/2)/∣x∣)x, smooth with nonzero derivative, and the last component is an even smooth function of ∣x∣. At the glued seam use signed collar distance t=±(1−r); the last coordinate becomes sin⁡(πt/2) and the first becomes cos⁡(πt/2)u, giving a smooth chart with invertible derivative. The maps are bijective on the two hemispheres and these local inverses are smooth, so this is a diffeomorphism.

[F4] Framed embedded surgery sphere: a framing is part of the data, and the product structure of φ is exactly the trivialization of the normal bundle of the underlying sphere.

[F5] Surgery is reversed by dual surgery: for a closed connected starting manifold, the two modifications are inverse up to diffeomorphism and share the same supporting manifold; the dual sphere has dimension q−1 and the dual piece is Dq×Sp.

1.1F4given

The disk chart at y0 exhibits the embedding φ:Sp×Dq↪Sp×Sq, φ(x,y)=(x,y) in the chart, with image in the interior; its restriction to the disk factor is the product trivialization, so φ is a framed embedded surgery sphere with underlying sphere Sp×{y0}, framed by the Sq-factor.

1.2F1F3F4given

Use the hemisphere parameterizations given by the map of [F3]. The removed neighbourhood in the second factor is one labelled closed hemisphere and its closed complement is the other, with matching boundary coordinate Sq−1. Thus removing the open tube leaves exactly Sp×Dq with the boundary identification specified by the product framing; no complement assertion for an arbitrary disk chart is needed.

2.1F1F2step 1.2constructalgebra

Glue Dp+1×Sq−1 to the complement of step 1.2 by the product boundary identification. By [F2] this is the rounded boundary of Dp+1×Dq. Choose a convex rounding of the product corners: its boundary is transverse to each ray from the origin, so it is {ρ(u)u:u∈Sm} for a positive smooth ρ. The radial map u↦ρ(u)u has smooth inverse z↦z/∣z∣, proving that this boundary is diffeomorphic to Sm. Rounding independence gives the same diffeomorphism type for other compatible roundings. This proves the first computation, including p=0 and q=1.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1

For the dual reading, regard Sm=∂(Dp+1×Dq) with the decomposition of [F2]; the standard framed Sp=Sp×{0} lies in the solid piece Sp×Dq and has tubular neighbourhood Sp×Dq⊆Sm, framed by the Dq-factor. The p-surgery on Sm along this sphere removes Sp×int⁡Dq and glues in Dp+1×Sq−1 along Sp×Sq−1, leaving two copies of Dp+1×Sq−1 glued along their common boundary; that double is the product Sp+1×Sq−1 of the double of Dp+1, which is Sp+1 by [F3], with the closed factor Sq−1, the gluing being the product identification. Hence the surgery on Sm along the standard framed Sp produces Sp+1×Sq−1.

4.1F1F2F3F5step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

For p≥1, the starting product is connected, so [F5] shows that the inverse of the first computation uses the belt sphere of dimension q−1 in Sm and returns Sp×Sq. For p=0, compute that inverse directly: in Sm=∂(D1×Dq), remove the interior of the belt tube D1×Sq−1 and insert S0×Dq. The complement is another S0×Dq, with the product boundary identification; their union is S0×(Dq∪Sq−1Dq)≅S0×Sq by [F3]. The second computation operates on the other sphere, of dimension p, in Sm, and produces Sp+1×Sq−1; its inverse returns Sm. Thus the two p-surgeries are not identified with each other's dual operations.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources