Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

k11/(k(k+1))=1\sum_{k \ge 1} 1/(k(k+1)) = 1

Example

k11k(k+1)  =  1.\sum_{k \ge 1} \frac{1}{k(k+1)} \;=\; 1 .

The series converges, so the symbol denotes (Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series), and its sum is exactly 11. The reason is the partial fraction identity

1k(k+1)  =  1k1k+1,\frac{1}{k(k+1)} \;=\; \frac{1}{k} - \frac{1}{k+1} ,

which makes the series telescoping with bk=1/kb_k = 1/k: the partial sums are 11/(n+1)1 - 1/(n+1), and 1/(n+1)01/(n+1) \to 0.

Compare k11/k\sum_{k \ge 1} 1/k, which diverges (The harmonic series 1/k\sum 1/k diverges, by condensation and by Oresme block grouping). The single extra factor k+1k+1 in the denominator is what separates the two.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The sequence bj:=1/ι(j+1)b_j := 1/\iota(j+1) for jNj \in \mathbb{N}, so that bj=1/kb_j = 1/k at k=j+1k = j+1; and the family dk:=1/(k(k+1))d_k := 1/(k(k+1)) for naturals k1k \ge 1, so that k1dk\sum_{k \ge 1} d_k is the series of jdj+1j \mapsto d_{j+1} (Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

[L1]

The canonical naturals ι(j+1)\iota(j+1) are positive, and reciprocals of positives are positive (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[L2]

(bjbj+1)\sum (b_j - b_{j+1}) converges if and only if (bj)(b_j) converges, and then its sum is b0limjbjb_0 - \lim_j b_j ((bkbk+1)\sum (b_k - b_{k+1}) converges iff (bk)(b_k) converges, with sum b0limbkb_0 - \lim b_k).

[L3]

For every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon (For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon, Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For every jNj \in \mathbb{N}: bjbj+1=1ι(j+1)1ι(j+2)=ι(j+2)ι(j+1)ι(j+1)ι(j+2)=1ι(j+1)ι(j+2)b_j - b_{j+1} = \dfrac{1}{\iota(j+1)} - \dfrac{1}{\iota(j+2)} = \dfrac{\iota(j+2) - \iota(j+1)}{\iota(j+1)\iota(j+2)} = \dfrac{1}{\iota(j+1)\,\iota(j+2)}.

givenL1algebra
1.2

The sequence (bj)(b_j) converges to 00: given a rational ε>0\varepsilon > 0, choose n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon; then for every jj with j+1nj+1 \ge n we have 0<bj1/n<ε0 < b_j \le 1/n < \varepsilon.

givenL1L3choose
2.1

The term of k1dk\sum_{k \ge 1} d_k at index jj is dj+1=1ι(j+1)ι(j+2)d_{j+1} = \dfrac{1}{\iota(j+1)\,\iota(j+2)}, so it equals bjbj+1b_j - b_{j+1}; the two series are the same series.

step 1.1given
2.2

By the telescoping lemma, j(bjbj+1)\sum_j (b_j - b_{j+1}) converges with sum b00=1/ι(1)=1b_0 - 0 = 1/\iota(1) = 1.

step 1.2L2L1
3.1

Therefore k11/(k(k+1))\sum_{k \ge 1} 1/(k(k+1)) converges with sum 11.

step 2.1step 2.2

Remarks

  • The value 11 comes from the first term of (bj)(b_j), not from the first term of the series. The telescoping lemma gives b0limjbjb_0 - \lim_j b_j, and here b0=1/1=1b_0 = 1/1 = 1 while the first term of the series is d1=1/2d_1 = 1/2. Reading the sum off the wrong one of those two numbers is the standard error, and it is why the lemma states the value in terms of b0b_0 explicitly.

  • Every telescoping identity is an identity between finite sums. Nothing about limits enters step 1.1; the only limit in the argument is 1/(n+1)01/(n+1) \to 0, which is the Archimedean property. That is the general shape of every telescoping computation on this page.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 68 results over 23 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources