How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Example
The series converges, so the symbol denotes (Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series), and its sum is exactly . The reason is the partial fraction identity
which makes the series telescoping with : the partial sums are , and .
Compare , which diverges (The harmonic series diverges, by condensation and by Oresme block grouping). The single extra factor in the denominator is what separates the two.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sequence for , so that at ; and the family for naturals , so that is the series of (Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).
The canonical naturals are positive, and reciprocals of positives are positive (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).
converges if and only if converges, and then its sum is ( converges iff converges, with sum ).
For every real there is a natural with (For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with , Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).
Verification
For every : .
The sequence converges to : given a rational , choose with ; then for every with we have .
The term of at index is , so it equals ; the two series are the same series.
By the telescoping lemma, converges with sum .
Therefore converges with sum .
Remarks
-
The value comes from the first term of , not from the first term of the series. The telescoping lemma gives , and here while the first term of the series is . Reading the sum off the wrong one of those two numbers is the standard error, and it is why the lemma states the value in terms of explicitly.
-
Every telescoping identity is an identity between finite sums. Nothing about limits enters step 1.1; the only limit in the argument is , which is the Archimedean property. That is the general shape of every telescoping computation on this page.
Depends on
- $\sum (b_k - b_{k+1})$ converges iff $(b_k)$ converges, with sum $b_0 - \lim b_k$
- Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series
- For every $\varepsilon > 0$ in a complete ordered field there is a natural $n \ge 1$ with $1/n < \varepsilon$
- Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing
- Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
- Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals
- Finite sums and finite products, by recursion
- The harmonic series $\sum 1/k$ diverges, by condensation and by Oresme block grouping
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 68 results over 23 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Telescoping series (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, An Introduction to Real Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)