How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tensor, dual, and Hom representation formulas
Example
For representations , the induced actions are
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Representations of the same Lie algebra.
These constructions are asserted in Direct-sum, dual, Hom, and tensor representations.
Verification
Applying two tensor operators to produces the two unmixed commutator terms and ; the mixed terms and occur with opposite signs and cancel.
On the dual, two applications give , which is exactly the displayed dual action of .
On Hom, expanding the commutator of and its -analogue cancels the mixed composites and leaves .
These computations verify the representation identity for all three formulas in [L1] and show why the dual minus sign and Hom subtraction are necessary.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, MIT 18.745 notes, §11.2, printed pp. 62–63 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kirillov, An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, §4.2, printed pp. 50–52 (standard reference, not scraped)