Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Direct-sum, dual, Hom, and tensor representations

Statement

Let (Vi)i∈I be representations of g, and let V,W be representations. Then the following formulas define representations:

x(vi)i∈I=(xvi)i∈I,

(xλ)(v)=−λ(xv),

(xT)(v)=xT(v)−T(xv),

x(v⊗w)=xv⊗w+v⊗xw,

on ⨁iVi, V∗, Hom⁡k(V,W), and V⊗kW, respectively.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Representations of one Lie algebra g on all displayed vector spaces.

[L1]

Their operators satisfy [ρ(x),ρ(y)]=ρ([x,y]) (Representations of Lie algebras).

[L2]

A bilinear map induces a unique linear map from a tensor product (Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups).

[L3]

Elements of an algebraic direct sum have finite support (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L3algebra

The componentwise formula preserves finite support by [L3]. Its commutator is componentwise, so [L1] gives [x,y](vi)=(x(yvi)−y(xvi))i; hence it is a representation, including for an empty family.

1.2L1algebra

For the dual formula, (x(yλ)−y(xλ))(v)=λ(yxv−xyv)=−λ([x,y]v)=([x,y]λ)(v) by [L1]. Thus the minus sign gives the required bracket action.

1.3L1algebra

On Hom⁡k(V,W), expand the commutator of T↦ρW(x)T−TρV(x) and its y-analogue. The two mixed terms cancel, leaving ρW([x,y])T−TρV([x,y]), which is the prescribed [x,y]-action by [L1].

1.4L1L2algebra

For each fixed x, the displayed tensor formula is bilinear in (v,w), so [L2] gives a linear endomorphism of V⊗W. Applying the x- and y-operators successively to a pure tensor produces two mixed terms in each order; they cancel in the commutator, leaving [x,y]v⊗w+v⊗[x,y]w. Since pure tensors span, this is the representation identity everywhere.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4∎

Each construction is linear in x and satisfies the bracket identity, so all four displayed actions are Lie-algebra representations without finite-dimensional assumptions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources