How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The dual action needs a minus sign
Statement
The dual action is , with no minus sign.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The proposed plus-sign formula on the algebraic dual of a representation.
The valid dual formula has a minus sign (Direct-sum, dual, Hom, and tensor representations).
Refutation
Write for the proposed plus-sign operator. Then , so the proposed operators reverse rather than preserve the Lie bracket.
In the standard two-dimensional -module, and . Hence , since the field has characteristic zero. The plus formula is therefore not a representation; the two minus signs in the commutator of the formula in [L1] correct this reversal.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, MIT 18.745 notes, dual representations in §11.2, printed pp. 62–63 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kirillov, An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, §4.2, printed pp. 50–52 (standard reference, not scraped)