How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Symmetric and exterior powers are representations
Statement
If is a representation of , the diagonal tensor action on preserves the symmetric and repeated-vector relation subspaces. It therefore descends to representations on and for every and over every field.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Lie-algebra representation and an integer .
Iterating the tensor-product construction gives the diagonal action (Direct-sum, dual, Hom, and tensor representations).
The two quotient relation subspaces are those in Symmetric and exterior powers over an arbitrary field.
A linear map killing a quotient relation subspace factors uniquely through the quotient (A module homomorphism vanishing on factors uniquely through ).
Proof
Every diagonal operator commutes with every permutation of tensor positions, because permuting after applying in one position gives the same summand as applying in the permuted position. Hence lies in the symmetric relation subspace.
Consider a pure tensor with equal entries in positions . Terms of differentiating another position still have equal entries in positions . The sum of the two remaining terms, with in position or , equals the tensor having in both positions minus the tensors having in both and in both; it therefore belongs to the span of repeated-vector tensors in every characteristic. Thus the exterior relation subspace is stable.
Stability makes induce an endomorphism on each quotient by [L3]. Since on , the same equality holds after passing to either quotient, and the induced actions are representations.
For the resulting action on is zero, and for it is the original action on ; the same construction proves the assertion for every without averaging or dividing by .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, MIT 18.745 notes, §11.2, printed pp. 62–63 (standard reference, not scraped)