How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Banach inverse theorem for a small Lipschitz perturbation of the identity
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a real Banach space (Banach space) and let be Lipschitz with constant and (Lipschitz map, -Hölder map for rational , and contraction). Then is bijective and its inverse is Lipschitz with constant at most . If in addition is of class for some (C k map between Banach spaces), then is a global diffeomorphism of onto .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a real Banach space , a Lipschitz map with constant , and .
Lipschitz with constant : for all (Lipschitz map, -Hölder map for rational , and contraction).
A contraction of a nonempty complete metric space has a unique fixed point; a Banach space is a nonempty complete metric space (A contraction of a nonempty complete metric space into itself has exactly one fixed point, the limit of the iterates from any starting point, Banach space).
Neumann: implies invertible with (Neumann series and small perturbations of bounded inverses).
A derivative is a norm limit of difference quotients, so a global Lipschitz constant bounds the derivative by wherever it exists (Fréchet derivative between Banach spaces, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).
Sum rule , -ness of for a map , and the inverse function theorem for maps between Banach spaces, (Chain sum product and composition rules for Banach derivatives, C k map between Banach spaces, Inverse function theorem for Banach spaces).
Verification
Fix and put . Then by [L1], so is a contraction of the nonempty complete metric space ; by [L2] it has exactly one fixed point, and is equivalent to .
Consequently is bijective with the unique fixed point of for each . If for , then , hence because .
Now assume is of class with ; then is of class and by [L5]. The derivative of satisfies by [L4], so and [L3] makes invertible with at every .
By the inverse function theorem [L5] applied at each , and using that is a bijection by [step 2.1], the global inverse agrees near each with the local inverse of ; being locally of class , is of class . Hence is a global diffeomorphism.
Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 prove all the assertions of the example.
Depends on
- A contraction of a nonempty complete metric space into itself has exactly one fixed point, the limit of the iterates from any starting point
- Inverse function theorem for Banach spaces
- Neumann series and small perturbations of bounded inverses
- The Axiom of Choice
- Lipschitz map, $\alpha$-Hölder map for rational $0 < \alpha \le 1$, and contraction
- C k map between Banach spaces
- Banach space
- Fréchet derivative between Banach spaces
- The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum
- Chain sum product and composition rules for Banach derivatives
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Zuoqin Wang, Lecture 6 — §§3.1–3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)