How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The exhaustion metric is explicit on the unit disc
Example
For the unit disc , the canonical exhaustion is so and for the functions , the exhaustion metric is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit disc and the functions and .
The exhaustion metric is defined from the canonical compact exhaustion (The exhaustion metric on a function space over a plane domain, Every plane domain has the canonical nested compact exhaustion by distance and radius cutoffs).
Verification
In , the boundary distance is , so the canonical condition is exactly . Thus and in particular .
On , the difference has supremum , which is already at most . Substituting into the definition from [L1] gives .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Matthias Weber, Complex Analysis, Ch. 5 §§5.1-5.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Elias M. Stein and Rami Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 2 §5.2 and Ch. 8 §3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sheldon Axler, Paul Bourdon, and Wade Ramey, Harmonic Function Theory, Ch. 2 (standard reference, not scraped)