How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Hecke trace skein calculation for a three-crossing braid
Example
Assume AC for the link-invariance and closure-isotopy assertions below. Work in the coefficient ring of The HOMFLYPT coefficient ring with the Ocneanu trace of The Ocneanu Markov trace exists and is unique and the invariant of The HOMFLYPT polynomial from the Hecke Markov trace. For the three-crossing braid one has With the trace values one has , , , and the skein relation of The HOMFLYPT skein relation holds on the triple at the middle crossing ( in ); the relation is equivalent to the polynomial identity , both sides being .
The closure is not a knot: the conjugation exhibits as conjugate to , the positive stabilization of , so is isotopic to , the -torus link, i.e. the Hopf link with two components (Markov conjugation and stabilization moves, Markov moves preserve the oriented closure up to isotopy). Consistently, at the Jones specialization , , of The Temperley-Lieb quotient and the Jones specialization the invariant takes the value on , and the same value on the -braid representative ; this is the value of the Hopf link in the normalization of this page, with the convention fixed by The Temperley-Lieb quotient and the Jones specialization.
Verification
Given: AC (The Axiom of Choice), the braid , the generators , the Ocneanu trace and the invariant . AC is used only through the cited link-invariance and closure-isotopy results; the trace calculations are algebraic.
[A1] and for , , and (The Ocneanu Markov trace exists and is unique, The Markov trace of an inverse Hecke generator).
[A3] for , the invariant is unchanged by Markov moves, , , in , and (The HOMFLYPT polynomial from the Hecke Markov trace, The Hecke trace construction is an oriented link invariant, The HOMFLYPT skein relation).
[A4] is multiplicative with and (The Hecke generators satisfy the Artin relations and are units, The exponent sum of a braid).
[A5] Conjugation of braids and positive stabilization preserve the isotopy class of the closure, and the closure of is the Hopf link (Markov conjugation and stabilization moves, Markov moves preserve the oriented closure up to isotopy, The closure of a geometric braid); the Jones specialization is with and (The Temperley-Lieb quotient and the Jones specialization).
Proof technique: direct computation from the trace recursion.
The trace of the three-crossing braid. By [A4], ; by the recursion of [A1] with and , . By [A2], , so by linearity and [A1], . Hence , and since by [A4].
The closure is the Hopf link. The braid identity holds in by cancellation; since embeds as , the element is a positive stabilization of , and [A5] shows that the closures of and are ambient-isotopic. The endpoint permutation of is , so [A5] gives two components. Closing its two positive crossings yields the usual two-crossing positive Hopf diagram, namely the -torus link. Hence is that Hopf link. In particular is not a knot, and the knot normalization is not used.
The other two trace values. The same recursion gives , and with from [A1], .
The Jones specialization. By [A5], with and , and with .
The skein identity. Applying to the three words , and with and using [A3] and [A4], , and . The skein relation of [A3] reduces, after cancelling the common factor and multiplying by with , to . Expanding, , so the relation holds identically in .
Agreement with the two-strand representative. For one computes , so by [A5] , the same value as step 2.2, as the invariance of [A3] requires for two representatives of the same link. This completes the computation and the cross-check.
Remarks
- The value is the Jones value of the Hopf link in this page's convention; the half-integral power of reflects the two components of the link in the normalization used here.
- The trace identity of step 3.1 is the one used in The HOMFLYPT skein relation; the example exhibits it on a word in which the middle letter is isolated, so no other relation enters.
Depends on
- The closure of a geometric braid
- The HOMFLYPT polynomial from the Hecke Markov trace
- Markov conjugation and stabilization moves
- The Temperley-Lieb quotient and the Jones specialization
- The HOMFLYPT coefficient ring
- Markov moves preserve the oriented closure up to isotopy
- The Markov trace of an inverse Hecke generator
- The Hecke trace construction is an oriented link invariant
- The HOMFLYPT skein relation
- The Ocneanu Markov trace exists and is unique
- The exponent sum of a braid
- The Hecke generators satisfy the Artin relations and are units
- The generic type-A Hecke algebra
- The Markov trace on the type-A Hecke tower
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theo Johnson-Freyd, MATH 448 Reshetikhin-Turaev invariants, lecture notes 15 January 2016, Sections 1-3 (the trace recursion and the skein relation) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joan S. Birman and Tara E. Brendle, Braids: A Survey, section 4.3 (printed pp. 47-49): trace values and the Jones specialization of the HOMFLYPT polynomial (standard reference, not scraped)