How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The identity function generates Lebesgue measure
Example
Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, for the associated Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure is exactly Lebesgue measure. In particular, the interval formulas become the ordinary length formulas
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice and the identity function on .
Assuming Countable Choice, the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure of the identity function is Lebesgue measure. (Lebesgue measure is the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure of the identity function)
The interval formulas for a Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure recover open, closed, and half-open interval values from the distribution function. (Interval formulas and atoms for a Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure)
Verification
By [L1], the measure attached to is .
Applying [L2] with gives [step 1.1, L2] , so every one of the four interval conventions has measure .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Example 2.35 (standard reference, not scraped)