Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The parallelogram law on two indicator functions in L2

Example

On [0,1] with Lebesgue measure, let

f:=χ[0,1/2],g:=χ(1/2,1].

Then

f+g22+fg22=2f22+2g22=2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two indicator functions f and g above.

[L1]

The L2 parallelogram law has already been proved (The parallelogram law in L2).

Verification

Proof technique: Evaluate all four L2 norms on a pair of simple indicator functions and compare the two sides directly.

1.1

Since f and g are disjoint indicators of sets of measure 1/2, [given, algebra] f22=g22=12,f+g22=1,fg22=1.

2.1

Therefore [L1, step 1.1] f+g22+fg22=1+1=2=212+212=2f22+2g22, exactly as [L1] predicts. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources