Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The parallelogram law on two indicator functions in L2

Example

On [0,1] with Lebesgue measure, let

f:=χ[0,1/2],g:=χ(1/2,1].

Then

∥f+g∥22+∥f−g∥22=2∥f∥22+2∥g∥22=2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two indicator functions f and g above.

[L1]

The L2 parallelogram law has already been proved (The parallelogram law in L2).

Verification

technique · Evaluate all four $L^2$ norms on a pair of simple indicator functions and compare the two sides directly
1.1givenalgebra

Since f and g are disjoint indicators of sets of measure 1/2, [given, algebra] ∥f∥22=∥g∥22=12,∥f+g∥22=1,∥f−g∥22=1.

2.1L1step 1.1∎

Therefore [L1, step 1.1] ∥f+g∥22+∥f−g∥22=1+1=2=2⋅12+2⋅12=2∥f∥22+2∥g∥22, exactly as [L1] predicts.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources