Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

L1 is not a subset of L2 on the line

Statement refuted

On R with Lebesgue measure, every L1 function lies in L2.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

For f0(x)=xaχ(0,1)(x), one has f0Lp exactly when ap<1 (xa on (0,1) and on (1,) calibrates Lp membership).

Counterexample

Proof technique: Use the power-function family xa near 0 with 1/2a<1.

1.1

Choose a=3/4 and set f(x):=x3/4χ(0,1)(x). Then [L1, given] a1=3/4<1, so [L1] gives fL1. But a2=3/2>1, so [L1] also gives fL2.

2.1

Thus f is an L1 function on R that does not lie in L2, [step 1.1] refuting the claim. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources