How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: includes into on every measure space when
Statement
For every measure space and every exponents , one has .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two power-function counterexamples on .
There is an function on that is not in ( is not a subset of on the line).
There is an function on that is not in ( is not a subset of on the line).
Refutation
Proof technique: Refute with the two power-function counterexamples on the line: one witness lies in and another lies in .
Taking and , [L1] already contradicts the claim.
The reverse failure [L2] shows why the line supports neither global [L2] inclusion.
Hence the displayed universal inclusion statement is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard L. Wheeden and Antoni Zygmund, Measure and Integral, Theorem 8.2 (standard reference, not scraped)