How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the -seminorm on calligraphic is a norm
Statement
On the representative space , the functional is a norm.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonzero function with zero seminorm.
The previous counterexample supplies a measurable function with (A nonzero function on a null set has zero seminorm).
A norm must satisfy the separation axiom (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms).
Refutation
Proof technique: Refute with a nonzero function supported on a null set, whose seminorm is .
Let be the function from [L1]. Then pointwise but [L1] .
This violates the separation axiom in [L2], so the -seminorm on [step 1.1, L2] is not a norm. ∎
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sheldon Axler, Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, Section 7B (standard reference, not scraped)