How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
on and on calibrates membership
Example
Fix and let
on with Lebesgue measure. Then for every :
- exactly when .
- exactly when .
So the single power family produces both inclusion failures on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Real numbers and .
Membership in means finiteness of (The function space for ).
Positive-base power functions have the usual antiderivatives away from the logarithmic endpoint, and (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers, The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t).
The comparison tests for improper integrals are available (Comparison tests for improper integrals).
Verification
Proof technique: Integrate on and on using the real-power antiderivative and compare the two thresholds and .
Because and , [L1] reduces both claims to the improper integrals of .
On , the antiderivative is when , so the improper integral converges when , that is, when . If , it is , which diverges by [L2]. If , then on , so divergence follows from [L2] and the comparison test [L3].
On , the same antiderivative converges when , that is, when . If , it is again , which diverges by [L2]. If , then for , so divergence follows from [L2] and the comparison test [L3].
Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove the two threshold claims.
Depends on
Used by
- L¹ is not a subset of L² on the line Counterexample
- L² is not a subset of L¹ on the line Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard L. Wheeden and Antoni Zygmund, Measure and Integral, Chapter 8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Chapter 17 (standard reference, not scraped)