Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

xa on (0,1) and on (1,) calibrates Lp membership

Example

Fix a>0 and let

f0(x):=xaχ(0,1)(x),f(x):=xaχ(1,)(x)

on R with Lebesgue measure. Then for every p>0:

  1. f0Lp exactly when ap<1.
  2. fLp exactly when ap>1.

So the single power family produces both inclusion failures on R.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Real numbers a>0 and p>0.

[L1]

Membership in Lp means finiteness of fpdμ (The function space Lp(μ) for 0<p<).

[L2]

Positive-base power functions have the usual antiderivatives away from the logarithmic endpoint, and dx/x=logx (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers, The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t).

[L3]

The comparison tests for improper integrals are available (Comparison tests for improper integrals).

Verification

Proof technique: Integrate xap on (0,1) and on (1,) using the real-power antiderivative and compare the two thresholds ap<1 and ap>1.

1.1

Because f0p=xapχ(0,1) and fp=xapχ(1,), [L1] reduces both claims to the improper integrals of xap.

L1given
2.1

On (0,1), the antiderivative is x1ap/(1ap) when ap1, so the improper integral converges when 1ap>0, that is, when ap<1. If ap=1, it is 01dx/x, which diverges by [L2]. If ap>1, then xapx1 on (0,1), so divergence follows from [L2] and the comparison test [L3].

L2L3step 1.1
2.2

On (1,), the same antiderivative converges when 1ap<0, that is, when ap>1. If ap=1, it is again 1dx/x, which diverges by [L2]. If ap<1, then xapx1 for x1, so divergence follows from [L2] and the comparison test [L3].

L2L3step 1.1
3.1

Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove the two threshold claims.

step 2.1step 2.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources