How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Thinning lowers observed lag correlation but discards information
Example
Let , let be uniform, and take the transition matrix and . Start the chain in . For , the lag- autocorrelation is . The theoretical functional-specific ESS per transitions is . If only every tenth state is retained, its lag-one correlation is , but its ESS under the same transition budget is approximately , below the unthinned .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two-state transition matrix, initial law , and Functional-specific effective sample size.
The Axiom of Choice assumed by the general time-homogeneous chain definition. The Axiom of Choice
A transition matrix has probability rows and defines its one-step transition probabilities. Transition matrices and n-step probabilities
Invariance means on every measurable set. Invariant and stationary distribution for a Markov kernel
The process stationarity convention is strict invariance of all finite dimensional laws under common time shifts. Stationary process and canonical path shift
when the autocorrelation sum is absolutely convergent and positive. Functional-specific effective sample size
A time-homogeneous chain has one-step conditional transition law given by its probability kernel relative to the stated filtration. Time-homogeneous Markov chain with transition kernel
Covariance and variance use centered second moments. Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
Verification
Given: The Markov chain and observable in the Example.
Each row of is nonnegative and sums to one. The uniform law is invariant because each column also sums to one, so by [F1] and [F2]. By [F5], the transition rule is time homogeneous. Repeated use of the Markov property gives, for times and states , the path probability : the first marginal is because , and each later gap uses the corresponding matrix iterate. This expression depends only on the gaps, so a common time shift leaves every finite-dimensional law unchanged, which is strict stationarity by [F3].
Under , and by [F6]. Given , the next value is with probability and with probability ; given , the signs reverse. Thus . Iteration gives . Since and , [F6] gives .
The sum is geometric, so . By [F4], the ESS for unthinned transitions is .
Keeping every tenth state gives retained lag- correlation . Therefore , and there are retained states. Its ESS is approximately , less than . The displayed lag-one correlation is lower, but the total information under a fixed transition budget is also lower.
Remarks
Thinning can still be useful when storing a draw or evaluating a particular functional is costly. Owen's discussion in §11.13 treats those storage and computation tradeoffs; the calculation above compares effective sample size under a fixed number of transitions when all states can be retained.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Probability measures and probability spaces
- Invariant and stationary distribution for a Markov kernel
- Time-homogeneous Markov chain with transition kernel
- Transition matrices and n-step probabilities
- Stationary process and canonical path shift
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Functional-specific effective sample size
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Art B. Owen, Monte Carlo Theory, Methods and Examples, Chapter 11, §11.13 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Aki Vehtari et al., Rank-normalization, folding, and localization, Appendix D (standard reference, not scraped)