Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Trivial forcing recovers the ground model

Example

In ZF let M be a transitive ZF model and P={1}M with its reflexive order. The unique M-generic filter is G={1}, M[G]=M, and for every fixed formula with ground names,

1Mφ(τ)Mφ(τG).

In particular 1Mφ(aˇ) iff Mφ(a) for ground parameters.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-element forcing preorder in the transitive ZF model M.

[F1]

Forcing theorem gives the truth lemma for the fixed formula.

[F2]

Check-name evaluation and reconstruction of G gives values of check names and the inclusion of M in its extension.

[F3]

Generic extensions satisfy ZF and preserve ground-model Choice establishes the generic-extension ZF framework; no AC branch is used.

[F4]

Valuation of names and M[G] gives unique valuation by setlike recursion and defines M[G].

Verification

1.1

A nonempty filter in the singleton preorder must be {1}. Every dense subset contains 1, since 1's only extension is itself. Hence G meets every ground dense subset and is the unique M-generic. Here G=P belongs to M.

F3given
2.1

For any ground name tau, its valuation recursion using G can be carried out inside M since G is a set in M and M satisfies ZF. It agrees with the external recursion: every subname and its sole possible coefficient are in M, and induction on name rank identifies the predecessor values and their set image at each step. Thus τGM. This gives M[G]M, while F2 gives MM[G]. Consequently M[G]=M.

F2F4step 1.1
3.1

F1 says that truth at the valuations is equivalent to a member of G forcing the formula. Its only member is 1, and the extension is exactly M by step 2.1. These substitutions prove the first display; F2 then replaces check-name values by the original parameters. For example empty and singleton names have values and {}, so 1 forces ˇ{}ˇ and does not force their equality. No Choice is used.

F1F2step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources