Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-node Gauss is exact through degree three but not for x to the fourth

Example

Assume Countable Choice. For Lebesgue measure on [−1,1], the two-node Gaussian rule has nodes ±1/3 and weights 1. The supplier theorem gives exactness through degree three, but the error on x4 is 8/45.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a=−1, b=1, m=2, r=3=2m−1, and Lebesgue measure μ on [−1,1].

[F1]

Positive-measure Gaussian quadrature moment data: a moment datum is a finite positive measure whose relative support contains at least m+1 points and whose moments through degree 2m−1 are finite.

[F2]

Monic orthogonal polynomials exist uniquely through the quadrature order: the monic degree-two polynomial p2 is orthogonal to every polynomial of degree below two.

[F3]

The m-node Gaussian quadrature rule for a positive measure: the nodes are the roots of p2 and the weights are the integrals of their Lagrange cardinal polynomials.

[F4]

Gaussian quadrature is exact through degree 2m−1 and has positive weights: the rule integrates every polynomial of degree at most 2m−1 exactly.

[F5]
[F7]
[F8]

Under Countable Choice, a bounded Riemann-integrable function on a closed interval is Lebesgue integrable and the two integrals agree (A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Verification

1.1F1F7F8given

By [F7], μ([−1,1])=2. Every relative neighborhood of a point in [−1,1] contains a nondegenerate relative interval, so it has positive measure by [F7]; hence the relative support is all of [−1,1] and contains at least three points. Each ∣x∣k, 0≤k≤3, is continuous and bounded on [−1,1], hence Riemann integrable and Lebesgue integrable by [F8]. Thus the moment datum conditions [F1] hold.

1.2F1F2F3F5F6F8algebra

Write p2(x)=x2+bx+c. Orthogonality [F2] to 1 and x, using [F8] to read the Lebesgue moments as Riemann integrals, and [F5, F6] to evaluate ∫−111=2, ∫x=0, ∫x2=2/3, and ∫x3=0, gives 2/3+2c=0 and 2b/3=0. Hence p2=x2−1/3, and [F3] gives nodes ±1/3.

2.1F3F5F6F8step 1.2algebra

Using the nodes from step 1.2, the corresponding cardinal polynomials are ℓ+(x)=(x+1/3)/(2/3)=(1+3x)/2 and ℓ−(x)=(1/3−x)/(2/3)=(1−3x)/2. By [F8], [F5], and [F6], their odd terms integrate to zero and their constant terms integrate to one, so [F3] gives both weights equal to 1.

3.1F4F5F6F8step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

By [F4], this rule is exact for every polynomial of degree at most three. Using the nodes and weights from steps 1.2 and 2.1, its value on x4 is (1/3)4+(−1/3)4=2/9, whereas [F8], [F5], and [F6] give ∫−11x4 dμ=2/5. The absolute error is 2/5−2/9=8/45.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources