Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Multiple-arrow incidence compactifications in dimension one at each vertex

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cited geometry suppliers. Take two vertices i,j, h≥0 arrows i→j, no other arrows, and βi=βj=1. Then EV=Ch. For the increasing word (i,j) the stable incidence is the point x=0; for the word (j,i) it is all of Ch.

Verification

Given: the two-vertex loopless quiver with h≥0 arrows i→j and βi=βj=1, the two words (i,j) and (j,i), and the choice assumption of the Example.

1.1givenalgebra

In either word the graded flag base is a single point, since the unique flag for (i,j) is 0⊂Vi⊂V and the unique flag for (j,i) is 0⊂Vj⊂V. There are no arrows other than i→j, and Hom⁡(Vi,Vj)=C, so EV=Ch, with coordinates the h arrow entries. For the word (i,j) the first line is Vi, and stability at r=1 forces xh(Vi)⊆Fj1=0, so every arrow coordinate vanishes and the subbundle rank is zero; for the word (j,i) the first line is Vj, stability at r=1 reads xh(Fi1)=xh(0)=0⊆Vj and at r=2 reads xh(Vi)⊆Vj, both automatic, so every arrow coordinate is free and the rank is h. These are the rank counts ∑h:i→j#{(p,q):νp=i,νq=j,q<p} of the incidence lemma Quiver full-flag incidence has a smooth projective compactification, namely 0 for (i,j) and h for (j,i).

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The lemma's compactification adjoins a trivial line to the incidence subbundle, so the line-projective sources are Plines(0⊕O), a point over the flag point, and Plines(Ch⊕O), and the corresponding maps to Plines(Ch⊕C)=Ph are the point [0:1] and the identity Ph→Ph respectively. The inverse image of the affine chart t≠0 is, exactly as in the lemma, the total space of the subbundle over the flag point: the point x=0 in the first case and all of Ch in the second. For h=0 both words give the two point maps, so arbitrary multiplicity including the zero case is covered.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources