How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quiver Full Flag Projective Semisimplicity Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonals Separated Morphisms and Valuative Uniqueness
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Proper and Projective Morphisms
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Morphisms Local Rings and Rational Maps of Affine Varieties
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Products Segre and Veronese Embeddings and Grassmannians
- Proj Projective Schemes Twisting Sheaves and Ampleness
- Projective Algebraic Sets Projective Morphisms and Cones
- Quasi Coherent and Coherent Sheaves and Vector Bundles
- Quiver Full Flag Projective Semisimplicity
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
Objective. This companion page records the two boundary phenomena of the incidence construction of quiver-full-flag-projective-semisimplicity. The first example takes the loopless quiver with one vertex and no arrows and : the representation space is a point, the incidence is the full flag variety of dimension , and the defect of the proper incidence map equals , so the map is not semismall; for the flag space is a point and the defect vanishes, exhibiting the exact boundary. The second example fixes two vertices with parallel arrows between them and one-dimensional vertex spaces: the stable incidence is the point for the word and all of for the word , and the two line-projective compactifications are the point inside and the identity of , so the whole multiplicity range including is visible in one computation.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
One-color quiver full flags need not be semismall
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cited geometry suppliers. Take the loopless quiver with a single vertex and no arrows, , and its unique word. Then and . The proper incidence map to the point need not be semismall: in this example its defect is positive.
Verification
Given: the loopless one-vertex quiver with no arrows, the space of dimension , the unique word of content , and the choice assumption of the Example.
There are no arrows, so , and the stability conditions of the incidence lemma Quiver full-flag incidence has a smooth projective compactification are vacuous; the lemma gives as the total space of the rank-zero subbundle, of dimension , and the map is the constant map to the point , which is proper since it is projective.
The semismall inequality on a target stratum with fibre dimension is ; here there is just the point stratum. The image of is the single point, and its single fiber is all of , so the defect equals , which is positive for ; hence this proper incidence map is not semismall. For or the flag space is a point and the defect is zero, so the non-semismall boundary is exactly , and a general quiver-flag decomposition proof must allow this case.
Multiple-arrow incidence compactifications in dimension one at each vertex
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cited geometry suppliers. Take two vertices , arrows , no other arrows, and . Then . For the increasing word the stable incidence is the point ; for the word it is all of .
Verification
Given: the two-vertex loopless quiver with arrows and , the two words and , and the choice assumption of the Example.
In either word the graded flag base is a single point, since the unique flag for is and the unique flag for is . There are no arrows other than , and , so , with coordinates the arrow entries. For the word the first line is , and stability at forces , so every arrow coordinate vanishes and the subbundle rank is zero; for the word the first line is , stability at reads and at reads , both automatic, so every arrow coordinate is free and the rank is . These are the rank counts of the incidence lemma Quiver full-flag incidence has a smooth projective compactification, namely for and for .
The lemma's compactification adjoins a trivial line to the incidence subbundle, so the line-projective sources are , a point over the flag point, and , and the corresponding maps to are the point and the identity respectively. The inverse image of the affine chart is, exactly as in the lemma, the total space of the subbundle over the flag point: the point in the first case and all of in the second. For both words give the two point maps, so arbitrary multiplicity including the zero case is covered.