How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A candidate outside posterior support is not admissible
Example
On with counting measure, take . Then and . The probability density is supported entirely outside the target support, so it is not admissible and has no finite ELBO.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two-point counting space, target density , and candidate .
Variational family and evidence lower bound: admissibility requires on and .
Verification
Given: The data in the Example.
Counting measure gives and . At the point , but , so the support condition in [F1] fails.
Also and , so . The absolute-integrability condition in [F1] fails as well; the finite-ELBO identity is not applicable to this candidate.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.