How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Variational family and evidence lower bound
Definition
Let be a measure space. Let be measurable and suppose Define the normalized target density . Then . For a measurable probability density (that is, ), write to mean -almost everywhere on . This is a support condition on the two densities. It ensures that the induced probability measures and have .
The normalization follows from positive-scalar homogeneity of the nonnegative integral: The induced density set functions are measures by The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure. Their total masses are one: by the probability-density hypothesis on , and by the preceding calculation. To verify the absolute-continuity claim, let satisfy . Then , so the zero-integral criterion gives -almost everywhere on . The support condition then gives -almost everywhere on , and hence . The homogeneity and zero-integral criteria used here are Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral and A nonnegative measurable function has integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere.
Call admissible when and Use the extended logarithm , agreeing with The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function on positive inputs. Since and , both functions are finite -almost everywhere: for either or , for every . Interpret the weighted logarithmic terms on this measurable conull set and set them equal to zero on its measurable null complement, so the resulting functions remain measurable. In particular, set , , , and equal to zero on . On the set where , admissibility implies -almost everywhere. Define the finite real number A variational family is a nonempty set of admissible densities. A maximizing member need not exist.
For a finite integer , let , let each be sigma-finite, and let . A mean-field density is a product of probability densities ; it belongs to the admissible mean-field family only when the product satisfies the support and integrability conditions above. Tonelli gives . The product form alone does not guarantee support or finite ELBO.
In a dominated Bayesian model, a posterior interpretation is available only with the model hypotheses and on fibers with finite positive evidence, as in Bayes formula for dominated kernels and Conditional density formula. In particular, Likelihood densities supplies separate likelihood versions but does not assert joint measurability in parameter and data. Supply the single jointly measurable density explicitly before using Tonelli or a posterior-kernel formula. No quotient is formed at zero or infinite normalizer.
Depends on
- Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures
- Likelihood densities
- Measurable spaces and measurable sets
- Measures on sigma-algebras
- The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function
- Probability measures and probability spaces
- The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates
- Bayes formula for dominated kernels
- The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- A nonnegative measurable function has integral $0$ exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere
- Conditional density formula
- For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
Used by
- Coordinate-ascent variational inference Algorithm
- An optimized mean-field law can lose posterior correlation Counterexample
- Gaussian mean-field reverse KL underestimates correlated marginal variance Counterexample
- A candidate outside posterior support is not admissible Example
- Exact discrete variational family attains log evidence Example
- Finite evidence and finite expected logs do not replace admissibility Example
- An admissible product has a finite coordinate normalizer Lemma
- A high ELBO alone does not certify posterior calibration Remark
- Evidence lower bound is log evidence minus reverse KL Theorem
- Exact coordinate updates are monotone and finite sweeps have a call bound Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David M. Blei, Alp Kucukelbir, and Jon D. McAuliffe, Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians (2017) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael I. Jordan, Zoubin Ghahramani, Tommi S. Jaakkola, and Lawrence K. Saul, An Introduction to Variational Methods for Graphical Models (1999) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronghuo Zheng, Zhiting Hu, and Yuntian Deng, 10-708 Probabilistic Graphical Models, Lecture 13: Variational Inference II (2015) (standard reference, not scraped)