Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An optimized mean-field law can lose posterior correlation

Statement refuted

Optimizing an independent Gaussian mean-field family by the evidence lower bound need not recover the marginal variances or dependence structure of the exact inferential target.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The reference area measure λ2 is supplied, as in the example's Lebesgue integration setting. Its Borel restriction has the half-open rectangle volume formula. Define λ1(A)=λ2(A×(0,1]) for Borel A⊆R; this supplies the needed length measure without an existence or completion construction. On R2 with the supplied area measure, put β=3/4 and define the target density γ(x,y)=12πβexp⁡ ⁣(−x2−xy+y22β). This target is an exact inferential target by taking prior density γ, the sample space {⋆} with Pθ({⋆})=1 for every θ, and likelihood version ℓ⋆≡1. The variational family consists of independent Gaussian factors q(x,y)=gm1,v1(x)gm2,v2(y),mj∈R, vj>0,gm,v(z)=(2πv)−1/2e−(z−m)2/(2v).

[F1]

A fixed measurable likelihood and positive finite evidence define the exact target; the displayed target density is its prior density when the likelihood is identically one. Exact inferential targets and approximation chains

[F2]

ELBO admissibility requires support on the target support and finite log integrals, and ELBO⁡(q)=∫q(log⁡γ−log⁡q) dμ. Variational family and evidence lower bound

[F3]

Under the supplied length/area measures' box-volume contract, compact bounded Borel Riemann integrals equal the corresponding measure integrals, and the density gm,v has mass one, mean m, and variance v. The proof uses explicit cutoffs and finite integration by parts and assumes no choice axiom. Gaussian density integrals for supplied length measures

[F4]

Tonelli applies to nonnegative product-measurable functions on sigma-finite product spaces. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product

[F5]

Absolutely integrable functions on sigma-finite product spaces may be integrated in either order. Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product

[F6]

A nonnegative measurable density defines a measure, which is a probability when its total mass is one. Integrating against that density measure agrees with integrating the product against the base measure. The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure, Probability measures and probability spaces, Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product

Counterexample

Given: The supplied reference measures and explicit target and variational densities above.

1.1F1F3F4F5F6F7F8algebra

Let ρ=1/2, so β=1−ρ2=3/4, and write ϕ(t)=(2π)−1/2e−t2/2. Countable additivity of the supplied area measure makes A↦λ2(A×(0,1]) a Borel measure, with λ1((a,b])=b−a by rectangle volume. The explicit intervals (−n,n] exhaust R and have supplied measure 2n, so the factor measure is sigma-finite. Its product exists by [F7]. It and the supplied λ2 agree on half-open boxes by the volume formula and on the finite-mass exhaustion (−n,n]2; [F7] and [F8] identify their Borel measures. All displayed densities and polynomial moment integrands are continuous and hence Borel: inverse images of open sets are open, and inverse-image preservation of sigma-algebra operations gives the Borel assertion. Thus [F8] makes them product-measurable. The compact comparison and Gaussian integral statements in [F3] now apply to these supplied measures. Direct algebra gives γ(x,y)=ϕ(x)gρx,β(y)=ϕ(y)gρy,β(x). Each inner Gaussian density has mass one by [F3], so Tonelli [F4] proves that γ has mass one and both marginals ϕ. By [F3] and density integration [F6], the marginal means are zero and second moments are one. Since ∣xy∣≤(x2+y2)/2, the cross moment is absolutely integrable. Fubini [F5], [F6] and the mean of gρx,β in [F3] give E[XY]=∫xϕ(x)ρx dx=ρ. Thus the target has marginal variances 1 and covariance 1/2. With likelihood one the evidence is 1, so [F1] identifies γ as the exact target.

2.1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8step 1.1algebra

For mj∈R and vj>0, [F3] supplies the normalized Lebesgue densities gmj,vj and their means mj and variances vj. Tonelli [F4] gives total mass one for q. The logarithms of γ and q are quadratic; the finite second moments and ∣xy∣≤(x2+y2)/2 make their absolute values integrable under q. Both densities are everywhere positive, so q is admissible by [F2]. Fubini [F5] and [F6] give Eq[X2]=m12+v1, Eq[Y2]=m22+v2, and Eq[XY]=m1m2.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra

One has log⁡γ=−log⁡(2πβ)−(x2−xy+y2)/(2β) and −Egmj,vjlog⁡gmj,vj=12log⁡(2πvj)+12, using the mean and variance in step 2.1. Substituting these expressions and the second moments from step 2.1 into [F2] yields ELBO⁡(q)=C−m12−m1m2+m22+v1+v22β+12log⁡v1+12log⁡v2, where C is independent of (m1,m2,v1,v2). The mean quadratic equals (m1−ρm2)2+βm22, so its unique minimum and the ELBO-maximizing means are m1=m2=0.

4.1F9F10givenstep 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

For either variance the variable part is r(v)=−v/(2β)+12log⁡v. The identity has derivative 1 and constants have derivative 0 by their difference quotients; [F9] then gives that r is differentiable on (0,∞) with r′(v)=(β−v)/(2βv). If 0<v<β, the mean value theorem [F10] gives c∈(v,β) with r(β)−r(v)=r′(c)(β−v)>0. If v>β, it gives c∈(β,v) with r(v)−r(β)=r′(c)(v−β)<0. Thus v=β=3/4 is the unique global maximum. The target variance is 1 and covariance is 1/2 by step 1.1, whereas the optimizing independent factors have variance 3/4 and covariance 0 by step 2.1. Thus the unique ELBO optimizer differs from the exact target.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

90 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources