Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gaussian density integrals for supplied length measures

Statement

For d∈{1,2}, suppose a countably additive measure λd on B(Rd) is supplied and satisfies λd ⁣(∏j=1d(aj,bj])=∏j=1d(bj−aj)(aj<bj). No assertion about constructing these measures is made.

  1. If Q is a nondegenerate compact box and h:Q→R is bounded, Borel measurable and Riemann integrable, then its integral against the supplied measure equals its proper Riemann integral. Nonnegative Borel functions on the whole space are computed from increasing compact-box cutoffs by monotone convergence.
  2. For the supplied λ1, every m∈R, v>0 and gm,v(x)=12πve−(x−m)2/(2v) satisfy ∫gm,v dλ1=1,∫xgm,v(x) dλ1(x)=m,∫(x−m)2gm,v(x) dλ1(x)=v. The signed first moment is absolutely integrable. These are density-integral statements and require no choice axiom in addition to the supplied measures.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The supplied Borel measures and their half-open-box volumes in the Statement.

[F1]

Borel sets form the sigma-algebra generated by open sets. A continuous real function is Borel measurable: its inverse images of open sets are open, and the sets whose inverse images are Borel form a sigma-algebra. The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space

[F2]

Measures are monotone; nonnegative simple integrals are finite sums of coefficients times cell measures and agree with the nonnegative integral. Measures are monotone, The integral of a nonnegative simple function, The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions

[F3]

Nonnegative integrals are monotone and homogeneous, and integrals are linear on absolutely integrable functions. Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)

[F4]

A bounded Riemann integrand has equal upper and lower Darboux integrals; continuous one-variable functions on compact intervals are Riemann integrable. The multidimensional Darboux and tagged-mesh definitions of the Riemann integral agree, A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion

[F5]

Monotone convergence and dominated convergence apply on a supplied measure space. Monotone convergence for the integral, Dominated convergence

Proof

technique · finite Darboux bounds followed by explicit cutoffs
1.1givenF2algebra

Every compact box has finite supplied measure, since it is contained in a larger half-open box. A bounded coordinate face has measure zero: enclose it in a half-open slab of arbitrary positive thickness η, with the other side lengths fixed and positive. Its measure is at most Cη by the given volume formula and [F2], and so must be zero. In dimension one this says that singletons are null. Consequently compact boxes have their usual volumes, and disjointifying a finite grid of closed cells only removes null faces.

2.1step 1.1F2F3F4F5construct

For a nonnegative bounded Borel Riemann integrand h on Q, take the infimum and supremum of h on each cell of any finite grid. The corresponding disjoint-cell simple functions bound h, and [F2] and step 1.1 make their integrals exactly the lower and upper Darboux sums. By [F3] and [F4], the integral of h is squeezed to its Riemann value. For signed bounded h, add a finite constant to make it nonnegative and subtract that constant's finite integral using [F3]. This proves the compact comparison. For nonnegative Borel H on the whole space, H1[−n,n]d↑H, so [F5] gives the cutoff assertion. The grids, extrema, and cutoff sequence are finite or explicitly specified; no countable selection is used.

3.1F1F4F5F6F7step 2.1

Put ϕ(t)=(2π)−1/2e−t2/2. It is continuous and Borel by [F1] and [F7]. On [−n,n], proper substitution t=2u in [F6] computes its Riemann integral. As n→∞, [F6]'s improper Gaussian value makes this tend to one. Step 2.1 identifies each compact integral with its supplied-measure integral, and [F5] gives ∫ϕ dλ1=1.

4.1F4F5F6F7step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Since ϕ′=−tϕ by [F7], compact integration by parts [F6] gives ∫−nnt2ϕ(t)dt=∫−nnϕ(t)dt−2nϕ(n). All functions and derivatives here are continuous, so the proper integral hypotheses hold by [F4]. Also nϕ(n)→0: for n≥1, n2/2≥n/2, hence 0≤ne−n2/2≤ne−n/2→0 by [F7]. Apply step 2.1 and monotone convergence [F5] to the nonnegative t2ϕ(t) cutoffs. Step 3.1 then gives ∫t2ϕ(t) dλ1=1.

5.1F3F5F6step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra

The bound ∣t∣≤1+t2 and steps 3.1, 4.1 make ∣t∣ϕ(t) integrable. On each symmetric compact interval, the Riemann integral of tϕ(t) is zero by oddness, using the proper substitution t=−u. Step 2.1 transfers these compact integrals to the supplied measure. Dominated convergence [F5], with majorant ∣t∣ϕ(t), yields ∫tϕ(t) dλ1=0.

6.1F3F5F6F7step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1constructalgebra∎

Fix m∈R and σ=v>0. On the explicitly specified intervals [m−σn,m+σn], proper substitution x=m+σt gives compact integrals of gm,v, (x−m)2gm,v and (x−m)gm,v equal to the corresponding integrals of ϕ, σ2t2ϕ and σtϕ on [−n,n]. Step 2.1 and monotone convergence give mass one and centered second moment σ2=v. Since ∣x−m∣≤1+(x−m)2, the centered first moment is absolutely integrable, and the same dominated-cutoff argument as step 5.1 gives centered mean zero. Linearity then gives raw mean m. This proves both claims for the supplied measures without constructing any new measure or invoking a choice-dependent normal-law supplier.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

99 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources