How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Metric approximation error decomposes along a finite reference chain
Statement
Let be a metric space, let be an integer, and take . Then where the sum is empty when . If and is the exact target from Exact inferential targets and approximation chains, the first term is the declared reference-to-target discrepancy and subsequent terms quantify adjacent approximation changes in the same metric. The scalar identity and absolute bound of Pathwise error decomposition along a reference chain are exact telescoping statements. No independence or default variance-addition rule follows; the MSE identity in MSE of a sum of error components includes covariance terms retains total bias and covariance terms.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A metric space , an integer , and points .
A metric is symmetric and satisfies . Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric
Scalar ledger stages are adjacent signed differences on one stated scale; the definition alone asserts no independence, centering, or unbiasedness. Successive statistical and computational error targets
A finite scalar ledger chain satisfies the signed telescoping identity and its absolute-value bound without an independence assumption. Pathwise error decomposition along a reference chain
For square-integrable scalar error terms, the MSE of their sum includes squared total bias and covariance terms; summing component variances alone is generally not the identity. MSE of a sum of error components includes covariance terms
Proof
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.
We prove by induction on that . For both sides are zero; for this is equality. If it holds through , then the triangle inequality [F1] gives .
Apply the triangle inequality once more to and then step 1.1 to bound by the displayed sum. For a scalar chain, [F2] specifies the same-scale adjacent errors and [F3] gives their exact signed telescope; when the terms are square-integrable, [F4] explains why squaring them retains bias and covariance terms rather than giving an automatic variance sum.
Depends on
- Exact inferential targets and approximation chains
- Metric space: $d(x,y) = 0$ iff $x = y$, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric
- Successive statistical and computational error targets
- MSE of a sum of error components includes covariance terms
- Pathwise error decomposition along a reference chain
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony Davison and David Hinkley, Bootstrap Methods and Their Application (1997), Chapter 2 §2.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alison L. Gibbs and Francis E. Su, On Choosing and Bounding Probability Metrics, International Statistical Review 70(3), 419–435 (2002) (standard reference, not scraped)