Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Metric approximation error decomposes along a finite reference chain

Statement

Let (M,d) be a metric space, let m≥0 be an integer, and take T0,T1,…,Tm,T^∈M. Then d(T0,T^)≤∑j=1md(Tj−1,Tj)+d(Tm,T^), where the sum is empty when m=0. If m≥1 and T1 is the exact target from Exact inferential targets and approximation chains, the first term is the declared reference-to-target discrepancy and subsequent terms quantify adjacent approximation changes in the same metric. The scalar identity and absolute bound of Pathwise error decomposition along a reference chain are exact telescoping statements. No independence or default variance-addition rule follows; the MSE identity in MSE of a sum of error components includes covariance terms retains total bias and covariance terms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A metric space (M,d), an integer m≥0, and points T0,…,Tm,T^∈M.

[F1]

A metric is symmetric and satisfies d(x,z)≤d(x,y)+d(y,z). Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric

[F2]

Scalar ledger stages are adjacent signed differences on one stated scale; the definition alone asserts no independence, centering, or unbiasedness. Successive statistical and computational error targets

[F3]

A finite scalar ledger chain satisfies the signed telescoping identity and its absolute-value bound without an independence assumption. Pathwise error decomposition along a reference chain

[F4]

For square-integrable scalar error terms, the MSE of their sum includes squared total bias and covariance terms; summing component variances alone is generally not the identity. MSE of a sum of error components includes covariance terms

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1givenF1inductionalgebra

We prove by induction on m that d(T0,Tm)≤∑j=1md(Tj−1,Tj). For m=0 both sides are zero; for m=1 this is equality. If it holds through m, then the triangle inequality [F1] gives d(T0,Tm+1)≤d(T0,Tm)+d(Tm,Tm+1)≤∑j=1m+1d(Tj−1,Tj).

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

Apply the triangle inequality once more to T0,Tm,T^ and then step 1.1 to bound d(T0,T^) by the displayed sum. For a scalar chain, [F2] specifies the same-scale adjacent errors and [F3] gives their exact signed telescope; when the terms are square-integrable, [F4] explains why squaring them retains bias and covariance terms rather than giving an automatic variance sum.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources