How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Likelihood densities
Definition
Let be dominated by the fixed sigma-finite positive measure . For each , the Radon–Nikodym theorem gives the almost-everywhere class ; a sigma-finite exhaustion for is also finite for the probability measure . Under AC, select simultaneously a finite-valued measurable nonnegative representative from each class. The nonnegative version exists by A sigma-finite positive measure has a nonnegative Radon–Nikodym density version.
For fixed observed , the function is the likelihood at . This is a function on the parameter labels, not a probability distribution on . No sigma-algebra on or measurability of is implied. Each density is determined only -almost everywhere; there is no canonical pointwise version and, for arbitrary uncountable , no common exceptional null set is asserted.
Depends on
- Dominated statistical experiments
- The Axiom of Choice
- The total variation |nu|(E) from countable measurable partitions
- The Radon-Nikodym derivative as an almost-everywhere equivalence class
- A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density
- A sigma-finite positive measure has a nonnegative Radon–Nikodym density version
Used by
- Expectation-maximization Algorithm
- The QMD route uses normalized absolutely continuous likelihoods and a separate uniform LAN premise Corollary
- An external dominating law need not be a valid sufficiency reference Counterexample
- Identifiability and KL support do not replace testability Counterexample
- A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel Definition
- Exact inferential targets and approximation chains Definition
- Exponential families and full rank Definition
- Families with a monotone likelihood ratio Definition
- Ideal and finite-simulation synthetic likelihood Definition
- KL projection sets and relative KL neighborhoods Definition
- Latent-variable joint and observed-data factorization Definition
- Likelihood-ratio equivalence on common discrete support Definition
- Likelihood-ratio tests with boundary randomization Definition
- Marginal likelihoods, proper model evidence, and Bayes factors Definition
- Root-L2 Hellinger distance for dominated laws Definition
- Score and Fisher information Definition
- Variational family and evidence lower bound Definition
- A finite identifiable model with posterior consistency Example
- Bernoulli likelihood ratio and change of measure Example
- Exponential and Weibull hazards with right-censored exposure Example
- Gaussian shift LAN and the regular sample mean Example
- A QMD score is centered and has finite information Lemma
- Countably partitioned sieves yield posterior contraction by weighted entropy Lemma
- KL prior mass gives a posterior denominator lower bound in probability Lemma
- KL-neighborhood prior mass lower-bounds the likelihood denominator Lemma
- Local KL and log-square mass bounds a non-IID posterior denominator Lemma
- Normalized product likelihood expansion under QMD Lemma
- Observed-data likelihood under a response model Lemma
- QMD controls singular and zero-overlap masses Lemma
- Tests and a sieve tail imply posterior contraction from a denominator bound Lemma
- The common-support likelihood ratio is measurable Lemma
- The likelihood-ratio rule is a measurable test of exact size Lemma
- Compact models admit tests at a unique KL projection under fractional-moment continuity Proposition
- A countable mixture dominates a sigma-finite dominated family Theorem
- A DQM score has mean zero and is unique Theorem
- A sufficient summary preserves the Bayesian posterior Theorem
- Compact-uniform LAN and rate contraction imply a total-variation BvM limit Theorem
- Dirichlet normal-mixture posterior contraction Theorem
- Equivalent dominating measures give equivalent likelihood ratios Theorem
- Finite-model posterior probabilities and Bayes-factor odds Theorem
…and 17 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ryan Martin, Lecture Notes on Advanced Statistical Theory, §§2.2 and 3.2, PDF pp. 30–33 and 54–55 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joshua M. Tebbs, STAT 512 Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes, §9.3, PDF pp. 118–123 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Charles J. Geyer, Stat 5421 Lecture Notes: Exponential Families, §3, PDF pp. 3–5 (standard reference, not scraped)