How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Normalized product likelihood expansion under QMD
Statement
Assume AC and Quadratic-mean differentiability at a parameter at with score and information . Let in , put , and write and . On define, for all sufficiently large , Then is a probability density relative to . For IID , let and . Under , Moreover, if is the normalized absolutely continuous component of relative to , then No full likelihood ratio for is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a common sigma-finite dominator , the QMD density versions at and , a square-integrable score , and .
The Axiom of Choice: AC supplies the simultaneous density versions in Likelihood densities.
Likelihood densities: Each selected is a measurable nonnegative density with .
A QMD score is centered and has finite information: and is finite.
QMD controls singular and zero-overlap masses: If and , then both are .
Khinchin weak law for integrable IID variables: For IID integrable real variables , in probability.
Identical distribution and IID families: Under , the coordinate variables are IID with common law .
The product measure of two sigma-finite measure spaces, For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique, Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system, and Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: Finite product laws are determined by measurable rectangles, and nonnegative product integrals can be iterated.
Total variation distance for probability laws: Total variation is over measurable events.
Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including , and Cauchy-Schwarz with its equality case, the triangle inequality for , the parallelogram law and polarisation: Cauchy–Schwarz bounds the Euclidean and inner products, and the norm satisfies the triangle inequality.
convergence implies uniform integrability: An -convergent sequence of nonnegative random variables is uniformly integrable.
Markov's inequality for random variables: For a nonnegative integrable variable and , .
The Lagrange and Cauchy forms of Taylor's remainder: A function with bounded third derivative on an interval has a quadratic Taylor remainder bounded by a constant times the cube of the increment.
Proof
Proof technique: square-root expansion, a triangular-array logarithm calculation, and a product-mixture bound.
Write , , and . For small , [F3] gives . Define on and on . It is nonnegative and measurable, and so it is a probability density. At , and -almost surely, since . On , The residual term has norm . Also and [F2], [F8] give . Therefore This is the required square-root expansion.
The product function is a density of relative to . For a measurable rectangle , Tonelli gives By [F6], agreement on rectangles identifies the product measures. Taking the whole space gives .
Since , By step 1.1, [F2], and [F8], Indeed, the difference between and has norm , so Cauchy–Schwarz makes the difference of their squared norms .
Apply [F4] to , whose mean is finite by [F2]. Then in probability: for fixed this is [F4] applied to , and the difference for is bounded by Step 1.1 and [F8] also give in probability, because its expected absolute value is at most . Consequently .
Put . Step 1.1 implies in , so in . By [F8], in ; [F9] makes uniformly integrable. For every , [F10] and the union bound give Also by [F3] and the union bound.
Let . Its centered IID sum has variance at most . By step 2.1, Markov's inequality [F10], applied to the square of the centered sum, gives This is the required expansion of the sum.
On the event that every and , Taylor's formula gives with one constant valid for all by [F11], since the third derivative of is bounded on . The total cubic remainder is bounded by a constant times , which tends to zero by the square-sum limit in step 2.2 and the maximum bound in step 2.3. Combining the sum expansion in step 3.1 with the square-sum limit gives This is the normalized log-likelihood expansion.
The full one-observation law decomposes as , where is the normalized restriction of to when . In the product mixture, the probability that at least one coordinate is drawn from is at most . Conditioning on the all-absolutely-continuous component shows, for every event, its probability under the full product differs from that under by at most . Since , [F7] proves the total-variation claim. If , the singular component is absent and the same bound is zero.
Depends on
- Quadratic-mean differentiability at a parameter
- Likelihood densities
- The Axiom of Choice
- A QMD score is centered and has finite information
- QMD controls singular and zero-overlap masses
- Khinchin weak law for integrable IID variables
- Identical distribution and IID families
- The product measure of two sigma-finite measure spaces
- For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique
- Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Total variation distance for probability laws
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including $p = \infty$
- $L^1$ convergence implies uniform integrability
- Markov's inequality for random variables
- The Lagrange and Cauchy forms of Taylor's remainder
- Cauchy-Schwarz $\lvert\langle x,y\rangle\rvert \le \lVert x\rVert_2\lVert y\rVert_2$ with its equality case, the triangle inequality for $\lVert\cdot\rVert_2$, the parallelogram law and polarisation
- The Euclidean inner product $\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
89 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Bartlett, Theoretical Statistics, Stat 210B Lecture 22, PDF pp. 9–11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Duchi, A few notes on contiguity, asymptotics, and local asymptotic normality, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)