Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A QMD score is centered and has finite information

Statement

Assume AC and a parametric model QMD at θ0 with score sθ0. Then Eθ0sθ0=0, and the information matrix Iθ0=Eθ0[sθ0sθ0T] has finite entries and is positive semidefinite. The QMD convention and square-integrability of the score are those of Quadratic-mean differentiability at a parameter.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; an open parameter set in Rd, a common sigma-finite dominator with density versions pθ, an interior point θ0, and the QMD score s=sθ0 with Eθ0∥s∥22<∞.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC supplies the selected density versions in Likelihood densities.

[F1]

Likelihood densities: Each pθ is a measurable density version satisfying Pθ(A)=∫Apθ dμ.

[F2]

Quadratic-mean differentiability at a parameter: For u→0, pθ0+u=pθ0+12(uTs)pθ0+ru,∥ru∥L2(μ)=o(∥u∥2).

[F3]

The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn: uTs=∑j=1dujsj and ∥u∥22=uTu are the Euclidean inner product and norm.

[F5]

Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases and Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including p=∞: On a probability space, ∣EUV∣≤(EU2)1/2(EV2)1/2 and the L2 norm satisfies the triangle inequality.

Proof

technique · differentiate the squared $L^2(\mu)$ norm along a line
1.1A1F1F2givenalgebra

Fix v∈Rd and put ft=pθ0+tv, f0=pθ0. By [F1]–[F2], ft−f0=t2(vTs)f0+rtv,∥rtv∥2=o(∣t∣). Since each density integrates to one, ∥ft∥2=∥f0∥2=1, and 0=2⟨f0,ft−f0⟩+∥ft−f0∥22. This identity uses the unit norms of the square-root densities.

2.1F2F5step 1.1givenalgebra

The increment has norm O(∣t∣), so its squared norm divided by t tends to zero. By Cauchy–Schwarz, the residual inner product ⟨f0,rtv⟩/t also tends to zero. Divide the identity in step 1.1 by t and let t→0; the remaining term is Eθ0(vTs)=0. Since this holds for every v, each coordinate of Eθ0s is zero.

3.1F2F3F4F5givenalgebra∎

Each sj is square-integrable under a probability law, so E∣sj∣<∞ by Cauchy–Schwarz. Also E∣sjsk∣≤(Esj2)1/2(Esk2)1/2<∞; hence every entry of Iθ0 is finite. For any a∈Rd, aTIθ0a=E(aTs)2≥0, proving positive semidefiniteness, with no nonsingularity assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources