How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A QMD score is centered and has finite information
Statement
Assume AC and a parametric model QMD at with score . Then and the information matrix has finite entries and is positive semidefinite. The QMD convention and square-integrability of the score are those of Quadratic-mean differentiability at a parameter.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; an open parameter set in , a common sigma-finite dominator with density versions , an interior point , and the QMD score with .
The Axiom of Choice: AC supplies the selected density versions in Likelihood densities.
Likelihood densities: Each is a measurable density version satisfying .
The Euclidean inner product on : and are the Euclidean inner product and norm.
Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases and Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including : On a probability space, and the norm satisfies the triangle inequality.
Proof
Fix and put , . By [F1]–[F2], Since each density integrates to one, , and This identity uses the unit norms of the square-root densities.
The increment has norm , so its squared norm divided by tends to zero. By Cauchy–Schwarz, the residual inner product also tends to zero. Divide the identity in step 1.1 by and let ; the remaining term is . Since this holds for every , each coordinate of is zero.
Each is square-integrable under a probability law, so by Cauchy–Schwarz. Also ; hence every entry of is finite. For any , , proving positive semidefiniteness, with no nonsingularity assertion.
Depends on
- Quadratic-mean differentiability at a parameter
- Likelihood densities
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Euclidean inner product $\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Cauchy-Schwarz $\lvert\langle x,y\rangle\rvert \le \lVert x\rVert_2\lVert y\rVert_2$ with its equality case, the triangle inequality for $\lVert\cdot\rVert_2$, the parallelogram law and polarisation
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including $p = \infty$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Bartlett, Theoretical Statistics, Stat 210B Lecture 22, PDF pp. 8–9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Duchi, A few notes on contiguity, asymptotics, and local asymptotic normality, §1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)