How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
QMD controls singular and zero-overlap masses
Statement
Assume AC and the hypotheses of Quadratic-mean differentiability at a parameter. Write , , and . Let Then and as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; QMD at with score square-integrable under , and density versions relative to the common measure .
The Axiom of Choice: AC supplies the density representatives in Likelihood densities.
Likelihood densities: Each selected is nonnegative and measurable with .
Quadratic-mean differentiability at a parameter: The residual satisfies .
Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases and Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including : Cauchy–Schwarz bounds inner products and the norm satisfies the triangle inequality.
Absolute continuity of the integral: If and , then .
Proof
Proof technique: restrict the QMD residual to the two support-complement sets.
Set . On , both and vanish, so there. Therefore This is the claimed singular-mass bound.
Let . On , , so where the last bound follows from [F1], [F2], [F3], and [F4]. Thus the sets shrink to zero in measure.
On , the residual identity in [F1] gives Taking norms and using [F3] yields This is the required norm bound.
Since is integrable and , [F5] gives . Step 2.1 therefore gives and . Because , this is the claimed zero-overlap bound.
Depends on
- Quadratic-mean differentiability at a parameter
- Likelihood densities
- The Axiom of Choice
- A QMD score is centered and has finite information
- The Euclidean inner product $\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Cauchy-Schwarz $\lvert\langle x,y\rangle\rvert \le \lVert x\rVert_2\lVert y\rVert_2$ with its equality case, the triangle inequality for $\lVert\cdot\rVert_2$, the parallelogram law and polarisation
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including $p = \infty$
- Absolute continuity of the integral
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Bartlett, Theoretical Statistics, Stat 210B Lecture 22, PDF pp. 8–10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Duchi, A few notes on contiguity, asymptotics, and local asymptotic normality, §1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)