Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Countably partitioned sieves yield posterior contraction by weighted entropy

Statement

Assume AC. For each n, let Πn be a prior on a measurable parameter space Θn∗, and let pθ be a jointly measurable family of finite-valued densities against one sigma-finite measure, and let p0 be the true density for IID data X1,…,Xn. Let ϵn,δn>0 satisfy δn≤ϵn, nδn2→∞, and nϵn2→∞. Suppose for a constant C0>0 that Πn ⁣{θ:KL(P0∥Pθ)≤δn2,P0[log⁡p0pθ]2≤δn2}≥e−C0nδn2. Let Sn⊆Θn∗ be a measurable sieve with Πn(Snc∣X1:n)→0 in P0n-probability. Partition it into countably many measurable sets Sn,j, put πn,j=Πn(Sn,j), and let Nn,j=N(ϵn,{pθ:θ∈Sn,j},h) be the finite covering number as defined in Covering, packing, bracketing numbers, and metric entropy, with centers in that density class, whenever πn,j>0. If e−nϵn2∑j:πn,j>0Nn,jπn,j⟶0, then for every sufficiently large fixed M, the posterior mass of {θ:h(pθ,p0)>Mϵn} converges to zero in P0n-probability.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A dominated IID model with a jointly measurable density family, AC, the displayed local prior mass, a measurable sieve with vanishing posterior complement, and a countable measurable partition satisfying the weighted entropy condition.

[A1]

Assume AC for the directional KL convention. The Axiom of Choice Kullback–Leibler divergence

[F1]

KL prior mass gives a posterior denominator lower bound in probability: if the local KL and log-square set has prior mass at least e−C0nδn2, then, except with probability at most (nδn2)−1, the normalized likelihood denominator is at least e−(C0+2)nδn2.

[F2]

Root-L2 Hellinger distance between density laws: h2(P,Q)=∫(p−q)2dμ and ∫pqdμ=1−h2(P,Q)/2.

[F3]

Hellinger distance is a metric and controls L1 and total variation: Hellinger distance is a metric and event-supremum total variation is bounded by Hellinger distance, including for finite product laws.

[F4]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative measurable likelihood-ratio integrands may be integrated in either order.

[F5]

Dominated statistical experiments and Likelihood densities: all densities are relative to the same fixed sigma-finite measure; the supplied family is jointly measurable, so likelihood-ratio integrals are measurable.

[F6]

Identical distribution and IID families and Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables: disjoint finite blocks of an IID sample are independent, and expectations of products of nonnegative functions of those blocks factor.

[F7]

Markov's inequality for random variables: for a nonnegative random variable Y and a>0, P(Y≥a)≤E[Y]/a.

[F8]

Probability measures and probability spaces and The measure with density f relative to μ: P0 and each model law are probability measures represented by their displayed densities; integrating pθ/p0 under P0 gives ∫{p0>0}pθ dμ≤1.

[F9]

Covering, packing, bracketing numbers, and metric entropy: N(ϵ,F,h) is the least finite number of centers from F whose closed Hellinger balls of radius ϵ cover F.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F1given

Put xn=nϵn2, yn=nδn2, and let Dn be the likelihood denominator relative to p0n. By [F1], on an event Ωn with P0n(Ωnc)≤yn−1, Dn≥e−(C0+2)yn.

1.2givenalgebra

Write Tn=∑jNn,jπn,j and sn=e−xnTn, so sn→0. Fix K>2(C0+3) and split indices into active Jn+={j:πn,j≥e−Kxn} and small-mass Jn−. Since Nn,j≥1, ∑Jn−πn,j≤e−Kxn/2Tn=e(1−K/2)xnsn. For active j, Nn,jπn,j≤Tn=exnsn, hence log⁡(Nn,j/πn,j)≤(2+2K)xn for all sufficiently large n.

1.3A1F2F9givenconstruct

Fix a sufficiently large constant M. If Mϵn≥2, then the alternative is empty because Hellinger distance is at most 2, and the desired posterior mass is zero for this n. For the remaining n, choose, by [A1], a finite ϵn-cover with centers in each active stratum's density image, as allowed by [F9]. Discard centers whose closed ϵn-ball meets no density in the stratum with h(pθ,p0)>Mϵn; at most Nn,j centers remain, and they cover that alternative. For every retained center q, the triangle inequality gives h(q,p0)>(M−1)ϵn. Set mn=⌈2log⁡8(M−1)2ϵn2⌉. On a block of mn observations define Tq=1{∏iq(Xi)>∏ip0(Xi)}. On rejection, p0⊗mn≤p0⊗mnq⊗mn, so its type-I error is at most the product affinity; on acceptance, q⊗mn≤p0⊗mnq⊗mn, so its type-II error under q has the same bound. By [F2], this affinity is (1−h2(q,p0)/2)mn≤e−mnh2(q,p0)/2≤1/8.

2.1F2F3step 1.3algebra

If h(pθ,q)≤ϵn, product affinity gives h2(Pθmn,Qmn)=2[1−(1−h2(pθ,q)/2)mn]≤mnϵn2, using 1−(1−u)m≤mu for u∈[0,1]; [F3] bounds their total variation by mnϵn. Since Mϵn<2, ϵn2<2/M2 and mnϵn2≤2log⁡8(M−1)2+2M2≤1/64 for sufficiently large M. The total variation is then at most 1/8. Therefore the block test in step 1.3 rejects with probability at least 3/4 under every pθ in the alternative and at most 1/8 under p0.

3.1F6F7step 2.1algebra

Divide Ln=⌊n/mn⌋ disjoint blocks and let Yk be their block-test indicators. Under each IID law the indicators are independent by [F6]; their means are at most a=1/8 under P0 and at least b=3/4 under every alternative by step 2.1. For independent Bernoulli variables with means at most a, exponential Markov [F7] gives P0(Ln−1∑Yk≥t)≤e−LnD(t∥a); with means at least b, the negative-exponential bound gives Pθ(Ln−1∑Yk<t)≤e−LnD(t∥b), where D(t∥u)=tlog⁡(t/u)+(1−t)log⁡((1−t)/(1−u)). These bounds follow by bounding each moment generating function by 1−u+ueλ (using u=a for λ>0, u=b for λ<0) and optimizing over λ.

4.1A1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1algebra

The function D(t∥a)−D(t∥b) is affine and strictly increasing on [a,b], is negative at a, and equals D(b∥a)>0 at b. Let t∗ be its unique zero. By AC [A1], for each active j choose tj∈[t∗,b] such that Ln{D(tj∥a)−D(tj∥b)}=log⁡(Nn,j/πn,j). This is possible after increasing M: writing A=2log⁡8, Mϵn<2 implies A/((M−1)2ϵn2)>2 for sufficiently large M, so the ceiling in mn costs at most a fixed factor; since nϵn2→∞, the floor in Ln also costs at most a fixed factor eventually. Hence Ln≥cM2xn for a universal c>0, while step 1.2 bounds the right side by (2+2K)xn. Define ϕn,j as the maximum of the block-majority tests over its retained centers (or zero if there are none), using threshold tj. Continuity on [t∗,b] and positivity of both divergences at t∗ give a constant c∗>0 such that (D(t∥a)+D(t∥b))/2≥c∗ there. The null union bound and step 3.1 give P0n(ϕn,j=1)≤Nn,jπn,je−c∗Ln; the same Chernoff bound for a center within ϵn of each alternative gives sup⁡θ∈Sn,j:h(pθ,p0)>MϵnPθn(ϕn,j=0)≤Nn,j/πn,je−c∗Ln by step 2.1.

5.1F4F5step 4.1algebra

Let ϕn be one on the countable union of the rejection events of ϕn,j over j∈Jn+ and zero otherwise; it is measurable as a countable union of measurable events. The union bound and step 4.1 give P0n(ϕn=1)≤Tne−c∗Ln. For the tested likelihood numerator on an active stratum, Tonelli [F4], the jointly measurable likelihood interface [F5] and change of density give E0[(1−ϕn)∫{θ∈Sn,j:h(pθ,p0)>Mϵn}∏ipθ(Xi)p0(Xi) Πn(dθ)]≤πn,jsup⁡θ in the setPθn(1−ϕn,j)≤Nn,jπn,je−c∗Ln.

6.1F7F8step 1.1step 1.2step 5.1algebra

Write dn=e−(C0+2)yn. For the active numerator Rn+, step 5.1 gives P0n(ϕn=1)≤Tne−c∗Ln and E0[(1−ϕn)Rn+]≤Tne−c∗Ln. Thus, for every fixed ζ>0, P0n(Rn+/Dn>ζ)≤P0n(Dn<dn)+Tne−c∗Ln+ζ−1dn−1Tne−c∗Ln. This tends to zero for sufficiently large M, since Tn=exnsn, yn≤xn, Ln≥cM2xn, and sn→0. For the small-mass numerator Rn−, [F8] and Tonelli give E0[Rn−]≤∑Jn−πn,j≤e−Kxn/2Tn; hence its posterior mass tends to zero in probability by Markov and the denominator event, because e(C0+2)yne−Kxn/2Tn≤sne(C0+3−K/2)xn→0 when K>2(C0+3).

7.1givenstep 6.1∎

The posterior outside the Mϵn-ball is the union of its active-stratum part, its small-mass-stratum part, and the sieve complement. Step 6.1 sends the first two parts to zero in probability, and the sieve-complement term tends to zero by hypothesis.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources