How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Countably partitioned sieves yield posterior contraction by weighted entropy
Statement
Assume AC. For each , let be a prior on a measurable parameter space , and let be a jointly measurable family of finite-valued densities against one sigma-finite measure, and let be the true density for IID data . Let satisfy , , and . Suppose for a constant that Let be a measurable sieve with in -probability. Partition it into countably many measurable sets , put , and let be the finite covering number as defined in Covering, packing, bracketing numbers, and metric entropy, with centers in that density class, whenever . If then for every sufficiently large fixed , the posterior mass of converges to zero in -probability.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A dominated IID model with a jointly measurable density family, AC, the displayed local prior mass, a measurable sieve with vanishing posterior complement, and a countable measurable partition satisfying the weighted entropy condition.
Assume AC for the directional KL convention. The Axiom of Choice Kullback–Leibler divergence
KL prior mass gives a posterior denominator lower bound in probability: if the local KL and log-square set has prior mass at least , then, except with probability at most , the normalized likelihood denominator is at least .
Hellinger distance is a metric and controls L1 and total variation: Hellinger distance is a metric and event-supremum total variation is bounded by Hellinger distance, including for finite product laws.
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative measurable likelihood-ratio integrands may be integrated in either order.
Dominated statistical experiments and Likelihood densities: all densities are relative to the same fixed sigma-finite measure; the supplied family is jointly measurable, so likelihood-ratio integrals are measurable.
Identical distribution and IID families and Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables: disjoint finite blocks of an IID sample are independent, and expectations of products of nonnegative functions of those blocks factor.
Markov's inequality for random variables: for a nonnegative random variable and , .
Probability measures and probability spaces and The measure with density relative to : and each model law are probability measures represented by their displayed densities; integrating under gives .
Covering, packing, bracketing numbers, and metric entropy: is the least finite number of centers from whose closed Hellinger balls of radius cover .
Proof
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.
Put , , and let be the likelihood denominator relative to . By [F1], on an event with , .
Write and , so . Fix and split indices into active and small-mass . Since , . For active , , hence for all sufficiently large .
Fix a sufficiently large constant . If , then the alternative is empty because Hellinger distance is at most , and the desired posterior mass is zero for this . For the remaining , choose, by [A1], a finite -cover with centers in each active stratum's density image, as allowed by [F9]. Discard centers whose closed -ball meets no density in the stratum with ; at most centers remain, and they cover that alternative. For every retained center , the triangle inequality gives . Set . On a block of observations define . On rejection, , so its type-I error is at most the product affinity; on acceptance, , so its type-II error under has the same bound. By [F2], this affinity is .
If , product affinity gives , using for ; [F3] bounds their total variation by . Since , and for sufficiently large . The total variation is then at most . Therefore the block test in step 1.3 rejects with probability at least under every in the alternative and at most under .
Divide disjoint blocks and let be their block-test indicators. Under each IID law the indicators are independent by [F6]; their means are at most under and at least under every alternative by step 2.1. For independent Bernoulli variables with means at most , exponential Markov [F7] gives ; with means at least , the negative-exponential bound gives , where . These bounds follow by bounding each moment generating function by (using for , for ) and optimizing over .
The function is affine and strictly increasing on , is negative at , and equals at . Let be its unique zero. By AC [A1], for each active choose such that . This is possible after increasing : writing , implies for sufficiently large , so the ceiling in costs at most a fixed factor; since , the floor in also costs at most a fixed factor eventually. Hence for a universal , while step 1.2 bounds the right side by . Define as the maximum of the block-majority tests over its retained centers (or zero if there are none), using threshold . Continuity on and positivity of both divergences at give a constant such that there. The null union bound and step 3.1 give ; the same Chernoff bound for a center within of each alternative gives by step 2.1.
Let be one on the countable union of the rejection events of over and zero otherwise; it is measurable as a countable union of measurable events. The union bound and step 4.1 give . For the tested likelihood numerator on an active stratum, Tonelli [F4], the jointly measurable likelihood interface [F5] and change of density give
Write . For the active numerator , step 5.1 gives and . Thus, for every fixed , . This tends to zero for sufficiently large , since , , , and . For the small-mass numerator , [F8] and Tonelli give ; hence its posterior mass tends to zero in probability by Markov and the denominator event, because when .
The posterior outside the -ball is the union of its active-stratum part, its small-mass-stratum part, and the sieve complement. Step 6.1 sends the first two parts to zero in probability, and the sieve-complement term tends to zero by hypothesis.
Depends on
- KL prior mass gives a posterior denominator lower bound in probability
- Root-L2 Hellinger distance between density laws
- Hellinger distance is a metric and controls L1 and total variation
- Kullback–Leibler divergence
- Probability measures and probability spaces
- The measure with density $f$ relative to $\mu$
- Identical distribution and IID families
- Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables
- Markov's inequality for random variables
- The Axiom of Choice
- Dominated statistical experiments
- Likelihood densities
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Covering, packing, bracketing numbers, and metric entropy
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Subhashis Ghosal and Aad W. van der Vaart, Posterior convergence rates of Dirichlet mixtures at smooth densities, Theorem 5 and proof (standard reference, not scraped)
- Subhashis Ghosal, Jayanta K. Ghosh and Aad W. van der Vaart, Convergence rates of posterior distributions, Theorem 2.1 and Lemma 8.1 (standard reference, not scraped)