How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Marginal likelihoods, proper model evidence, and Bayes factors
Definition
Let with be a finite model index set. For each , let be a measurable parameter space, let be a probability measure (Probability measures and probability spaces) on it, and let be a sampling kernel for a statistical experiment (Statistical experiments) on one common data space . Assume the experiments are dominated (Dominated statistical experiments) by the same supplied sigma-finite measure . Fix a specified likelihood density (Likelihood densities) such that Require that each is jointly measurable in parameter and data; separate likelihood versions do not imply this joint measurability. Assign prior model weights with . The marginal likelihood, or model evidence, at is the possibly extended value This is the BCS-02 evidence normalizer (Evidence normalizer and fiberwise posterior update) specialized to a proper model prior, and is the prior-predictive density relative to the specified common data measure. For models whose evidences at are both finite and positive, the Bayes factor for against is The corresponding prior model odds are . No Bayes factor is defined here using an arbitrarily scaled improper parameter prior.
Remarks
A Bayes factor is an odds multiplier. This page supplies no universal cutoff that converts its numerical magnitude into a binary decision about which model is true.
Depends on
Used by
- Type-II maximum marginal likelihood and empirical-Bayes plug-in posterior Definition
- A diffuse normal prior changes the point-null Bayes factor Example
- An improper flat-prior scale makes a formal evidence arbitrary Example
- Point-null mass under atomic and continuous priors Example
- Finite-model posterior probabilities and Bayes-factor odds Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Gelman et al., Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed., §7.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alicia A. Johnson, Miles Q. Ott, and Mine Dogucu, Bayes Rules!, Chapter 8, §§8.2.1–8.2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)