How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Type-II maximum marginal likelihood and empirical-Bayes plug-in posterior
Definition
Assume a finite-group hierarchy as in Finite-group hierarchical Bayesian model, with hyperparameter , group parameters , conditional probability kernel (Measure kernel and probability kernel) on the group-parameter space, and specified jointly measurable likelihood density against the common product data measure. For fixed , define its marginal likelihood Where the function is finite-valued and attains a positive finite maximum, a Type-II maximum marginal likelihood choice is any This definition does not assert that a maximum exists. A data-indexed choice requires a selected measurable maximizer on its domain.
Only when define the corresponding empirical-Bayes plug-in posterior on a measurable by The finite-positive condition makes this a probability update by Fiberwise posterior propriety is equivalent to finite positive evidence.
Under a proper hyperprior , at a data fiber with finite positive joint evidence , full Bayes instead retains the posterior law of jointly with the group parameters, as in Hierarchical posterior normalization on positive finite evidence. Integrating over a shared uncertain hyperparameter can induce dependence between group parameters, while a plug-in update fixes that hyperparameter at one selected value; special cases can leave the groups independent. This definition asserts no generic empirical-Bayes risk, consistency, dominance, or credible-coverage guarantee.
Depends on
- Finite-group hierarchical Bayesian model
- Measure kernel and probability kernel
- Marginal likelihoods, proper model evidence, and Bayes factors
- Evidence normalizer and fiberwise posterior update
- Fiberwise posterior propriety is equivalent to finite positive evidence
- Hierarchical posterior normalization on positive finite evidence
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Gelman et al., Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed., §§5.1, 5.3–5.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alicia A. Johnson, Miles Q. Ott, and Mine Dogucu, Bayes Rules!, Chapter 16, §§16.3–16.4 (standard reference, not scraped)