How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A shared hyperparameter can couple group parameters
Example
Give their discrete sigma-algebras. Let have prior probability at each value. Given , let be conditionally independent with almost surely. For each group, let the observation space be the singleton with its full sigma-algebra and counting measure . Let the observation kernel be point mass at , with specified jointly measurable density relative to . The data contain no information about .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite two-group hierarchy and singleton observation kernels specified in the Example.
In a finite-group hierarchy, a proper hyperprior and conditional group kernel define the latent prior; the groups are conditionally independent given the shared hyperparameter. Finite-group hierarchical Bayesian model
On a fiber with positive finite evidence, the hierarchical posterior is the normalized joint likelihood times latent prior. Hierarchical posterior normalization on positive finite evidence
Type-II maximum marginal likelihood selects an attained maximizer only where it exists, and its plug-in posterior fixes the chosen hyperparameter. Type-II maximum marginal likelihood and empirical-Bayes plug-in posterior
A measurable space is standard Borel when it is bimeasurably isomorphic to a Polish space. The finite discrete spaces here are Polish. Standard Borel spaces
Verification
Given: The hierarchy and singleton observations in the Example.
The finite discrete spaces are standard Borel by [F4]. The two-point hyperprior is proper, and are probability kernels, and each singleton observation measure is finite, hence sigma-finite. Its observation kernel has the specified density , jointly measurable on the finite product space. Thus the hierarchy in [F1] is well-defined and its joint evidence is . By [F2], the full posterior equals the prior: it assigns probability to and to .
For either fixed , the conditional marginal likelihood is , so both values attain the maximum. The map from the singleton data space to is measurable, hence [F3] permits the plug-in choice ; its posterior is .
Under the full posterior in step 1.1, but . Therefore the group parameters are dependent after the shared hyperparameter is integrated out, and the full posterior differs from the plug-in posterior in step 2.1.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Gelman et al., Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed., §§5.1, 5.3–5.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alicia A. Johnson, Miles Q. Ott, and Mine Dogucu, Bayes Rules!, Chapter 16, §§16.3–16.4 (standard reference, not scraped)