How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Likelihood-ratio tests with boundary randomization
Definition
Let be the two-law statistical experiment (Statistical experiments). Assume are both absolutely continuous with respect to a supplied sigma-finite measure on (Dominated statistical experiments) and specify finite-valued, nonnegative measurable RN density representatives and (Likelihood densities). Under the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), Likelihood densities supplies such representatives for arbitrary dominated laws. If the representatives are given as part of the setup, the construction below requires no choice.
Define the common-support likelihood ratio The result The common-support likelihood ratio is measurable shows that is finite-valued, nonnegative, and measurable. The set is kept separate from the ratio region.
For , define the rejection function For , choose and satisfying whose existence follows from A likelihood-ratio threshold with boundary randomization exists applied to and . Define
This specifies the candidate likelihood-ratio rejection function.
Remarks
The common dominating measure and the specified density representatives are part of the setup. The general density-selection branch uses the Axiom of Choice through Likelihood densities; with explicit representatives, the cutoff existence result and displayed construction are choice-free.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- George Deligiannidis, SB2.1 Foundations of Statistical Inference, Chapter 13, §13.1.2, PDF p. 77 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Anna Mikusheva, MIT 14.381 Lecture 9: Uniformly Most Powerful Tests, PDF pp. 2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Karl B. Gregory, USC STAT 713 Lecture 11: Neyman–Pearson and Karlin–Rubin, PDF pp. 7–9 (standard reference, not scraped)