How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Nyquist mode at and beyond the leapfrog CFL endpoint
Example
Let be even and consider the periodic centered leapfrog wave scheme. At , its Nyquist mode has a repeated root and admits linear-in-time growth unless the starting coefficient satisfies . The usual modified quadratic energy is semidefinite there and is indefinite for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An even periodic grid of real-valued states, , and a Nyquist mode .
The periodic wave recurrence is defined in Centered leapfrog wave recurrence with Dirichlet and periodic rows.
At and even , the periodic wave theorem gives the Nyquist root and compatibility condition (Periodic leapfrog amplification, finite-time bounds, and the Nyquist endpoint).
The one-dimensional heat symbol with unit diffusivity gives (Periodic heat-stencil eigenvalues and θ amplification factor).
The finite root-of-unity sum gives orthogonality of distinct Fourier modes (Orthogonality of the characters on ).
The periodic grid norm is (Uniform periodic, infinite, and Dirichlet grid conventions).
The periodic forward-difference inner product is (Uniform periodic, infinite, and Dirichlet grid conventions).
Verification
For the Nyquist mode, , so the recurrence polynomial is . At this is , with solution ; the coefficient vanishes exactly when .
If , then . The roots of are real and negative because the discriminant is , their product is , and their sum is . Hence one root has modulus greater than one.
Define the periodic modified energy of adjacent states , by For one normalized Fourier mode with coefficients , put and . Reindexing the finite periodic sum gives . Thus [F3] gives , while [F4] gives orthogonality; the nonzero orthogonal vectors form a basis of the -dimensional space . By [F5] they are normalized by . Since and , . Summing these diagonal contributions using [F6] gives the modal energy At , , so every modal term is nonnegative, while the Nyquist velocity coefficient is zero. Orthogonal Fourier decomposition makes semidefinite.
Set the real amplitude and take and . Then , , and , so It is zero at and negative at .
The state has . Together with step 1.4, this shows that the form is indefinite for .
Depends on
- Centered leapfrog wave recurrence with Dirichlet and periodic rows
- Periodic leapfrog amplification, finite-time bounds, and the Nyquist endpoint
- Periodic heat-stencil eigenvalues and θ amplification factor
- Orthogonality of the characters $x\mapsto e^{2\pi ikx/N}$ on $\mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z$
- Uniform periodic, infinite, and Dirichlet grid conventions
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Endre Süli, B6.1 Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations (standard reference, not scraped)