How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weak convergence of gaussian laws by parameters
Example
Assume AC. If and with , then , including .
Facts & Assumptions
Standard normal and normal laws: Assume AC. Define for Borel E in . By lem-normal-density-has-total-mass-one and thm-indefinite-integral-of-a-nonnegative-function-is-a-measure, gamma is a probability measure; denote it . For and , define as the law of on . This affine map is continuous: for >0 choose =/, and for =0 it is constant. Its inverse images of opens are open, so it is Borel measurable. lem-law-of-a-random-element-is-a-probability-measure makes its pushforward a probability. When =0, the preimage of E is all of R if m belongs to E and empty otherwise, so in def-dirac-measure.
Dominated convergence: Let and be measurable complex-valued functions such that almost everywhere and almost everywhere for a single nonnegative measurable function with . Then , and hence
Change of variables for expectation: Let be a random element, let be its law, and let or be measurable.
- If , then
- If is integrable, then is integrable with respect to and the same formula holds:
Weak convergence of borel probability measures: For Borel probability measures on a metric space S, write if for every bounded continuous real function f on S. Continuity is def-metric-continuity. Such f is Borel measurable (inverse images of open sets are open) and , so the integrals are finite in def-integrable-real-and-complex-functions-and-their-integrals. No completeness or coupling is required.
Verification
Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.
On the standard-normal probability space gamma of F1, put Z(x)=x, and . For every finite x, . Their laws are the stated affine normal laws by that definition.
For bounded continuous f, f()->f(Y) pointwise and , an integrable constant since gamma has mass one. F2 gives convergence of their expectations, and F3 translates this into convergence of the normal-law integrals. Thus F4 applies. When =0 the limit Y is the constant m, with law .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, §3.2, bounded continuous test criterion (standard reference, not scraped)