Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An explicit two-site periodic transfer matrix and permutation Hamiltonian

Example

Take N=2, two sites, and equal inhomogeneities a1=a2=i/2 in Finite periodic fundamental evaluation chain and transfer matrix. With P12 the flip of the two quantum factors, direct evaluation gives

τ(u)=(2u2+12)I−P12,τ(i/2)=−P12,τ′(i/2)=2iI.

Consequently the normalized logarithmic-derivative operator

H=i2τ′(i/2)τ(i/2)−1−I

is P12−I. This example is the explicit two-site specialization of the shared finite C2 family The rational spin-1/2 spectral R-matrix; no new spin-1/2 spectral matrix is introduced.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two-site chain at N=2 with equal inhomogeneities i/2, and the transfer-matrix definition and commutativity theorem.

[F1]

Finite periodic fundamental evaluation chain and transfer matrix: L0j(u)=(u−aj)I+iP0j, M0(u)=L01(u)L02(u), and τ(u)=tr⁡0M0(u).

[F2]

Finite periodic transfer matrices commute: the finite periodic chain satisfies [τ(u),τ(v)]=0 for all complex u,v.

[F3]

The rational spin-1/2 spectral R-matrix: on the ordered two-dimensional basis, R(u)=uI+iP with P(ea⊗eb)=eb⊗ea.

Proof

1.1givenF1F3algebra

Set q=u−i/2. By [F1] and [F3], M0(u)=(qI+iP01)(qI+iP02)=q2I+iq(P01+P02)−P01P02. The explicit partial traces are tr⁡0I=2I, tr⁡0P01=tr⁡0P02=I, and tr⁡0(P01P02)=P12. For the last identity, expand P0j=∑r,sErs(0)Esr(j), multiply using ErsEtu=δstEru, and trace the auxiliary factor to obtain ∑r,sEsr(1)Ers(2)=P12. Therefore τ(u)=2(q2+iq)I−P12=(2u2+12)I−P12.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

Substitution u=i/2 gives τ(i/2)=−P12, and differentiating the polynomial gives τ′(i/2)=4(i/2)I=2iI. Since P122=I, the inverse of −P12 is −P12. Thus (i/2)τ′(i/2)τ(i/2)−1−I=(i/2)(2iI)(−P12)−I=P12−I.

3.1givenF2step 2.1algebra∎

The whole polynomial family commutes by [F2], including this specialization; the calculation above identifies one normalized logarithmic derivative and uses no limiting inverse at a singular spectral difference.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources