Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

fs-an-unbounded-total-derived-functor-exists-from-enough-injectives-alone.md

Statement

Enough injectives alone licenses the unbounded right-derived-functor recipe using an arbitrary quasi-isomorphism into any termwise injective complex.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Enough injectives alone licenses the unbounded right-derived-functor recipe using an arbitrary quasi-isomorphism into any termwise injective complex.

[F1]

K-injectivity requires vanishing of Hom from every acyclic source into the target shifts (Homotopically injective bounded below complex).

[F2]

The defined right total derived functor uses bounded-below injective replacements (Right total derived functor on the bounded below derived category).

[F3]

Assuming AC, Baer characterizes injectives by extension of maps from all left ideals (Baer's criterion for injective modules).

Refutation

1.1

Assume AC and put R=Z/4. Its ideals are 0,2R,R. An R-map 2RR sends 2 to 0 or 2, so it extends by multiplication by 0 or 1. Maps on 0 and R extend trivially. Baer's criterion therefore makes R injective. The doubly infinite complex Ii=R,di=2 is termwise injective and acyclic since kernel and image of two both equal 2R.

F3algebra
2.1

For F=HomR(R/2,), each F(Ii) is 2RZ/2, and its differential is zero. Thus F(I) is not acyclic. The quasi-isomorphism 0I is a termwise-injective replacement of the zero complex, but this recipe sends it to a nonzero derived object, while replacement by zero gives zero. The unbounded recipe is therefore not well defined.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Indeed I is not K-injective: if its identity were nullhomotopic, the degreewise equation would be 1=2ai+2ai+1, impossible modulo two. An acyclic complex must have zero Hom into a K-injective target, so taking the source to be I violates that condition. The bounded-below construction avoids this example through its boundedness hypothesis. This refutes the arbitrary-replacement assertion, not existence of unbounded derived functors by other methods.

F1F2step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources