How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
fs-brutal-and-canonical-truncation-are-the-same.md
Statement
Brutal and canonical truncation of a complex at the same degree always coincide, even up to derived isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Brutal and canonical truncation of a complex at the same degree always coincide, even up to derived isomorphism.
Brutal truncation retains the original boundary term (Brutal truncation of a complex).
Canonical upper truncation replaces its boundary term by the kernel of the outgoing differential (Canonical truncation of a complex).
Refutation
Take in degrees , zero elsewhere. Brutal upper truncation at zero is . Canonical upper truncation has degree-zero term , hence .
Their degree-zero cohomology groups are and zero, so they are neither equal complexes nor isomorphic derived objects. The endpoint kernel correction changes the answer.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Boundary check against the licensed construction (standard reference, not scraped)