How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Brutal truncation of a complex
Definition
For a cochain complex and , the brutal truncations are for and zero otherwise, and for and zero otherwise. Retain the differentials between retained terms and use zero for all other differentials. The former is a quotient ; the latter is a subcomplex . These are functorial constructions of cochain complexes as in Cochain complex in an abelian category; no kernel or cokernel correction is made at the cut.
Depends on
Used by
- Canonical truncation of a complex Definition
- ex-brutal-versus-canonical-truncation.md Example
- fs-brutal-and-canonical-truncation-are-the-same.md False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- 12.15, all four chain and four cochain truncations (standard reference, not scraped)