How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
False statement: every Artinian module is Noetherian
Statement
False claim: every Artinian module is Noetherian. See The Prüfer -group is Artinian but not Noetherian.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the false claim.
For every prime , the Prüfer group is Artinian but not Noetherian as a -module. (The Prüfer -group is Artinian but not Noetherian).
Refutation
We use the preceding Prüfer -group, quoting its complete subgroup classification to establish DCC and its strict ascending chain of finite cyclic subgroups to refute Noetherianity.
One witness refutes a universally quantified claim, and is one: it is Artinian and not Noetherian by [L1], so "every Artinian module is Noetherian" is false. This proves the stated claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 18 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arvind Nair, Algebra I, Lecture 5 (standard reference, not scraped)