How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
and are algebraic integers, while is not
Example
The numbers and are algebraic integers, whereas is not. See Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.
Let be a homomorphism of commutative rings. An element is integral over when it is a root of a monic polynomial in . The extension is integral when every element is integral. An algebraic integer is a complex number integral over . (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).
A rational number is an algebraic integer if and only if it is an integer. (The rational algebraic integers are exactly the integers).
Let be a complete ordered field (def-complete-ordered-field). Then every with has a unique with and ; we write . Consequently the positive elements of are exactly the nonzero squares: if and only if for some . (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ).
Verification
The number is a root of the monic polynomial , and is a root of the monic polynomial ; both are therefore algebraic integers.
The rational algebraic-integer criterion already excludes . Directly, a monic equation of degree at would, after multiplication by , read , whose left side is odd. This proves the stated claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 33 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Eloisa Grifo, Commutative Algebra I, Section 1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)