Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-17
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

2 and (1+5)/2 are algebraic integers, while 1/2 is not

Example

The numbers 2 and (1+5)/2 are algebraic integers, whereas 1/2 is not. See Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Example.

[L1]

Let A→B be a homomorphism of commutative rings. An element b∈B is integral over A when it is a root of a monic polynomial in A[X]. The extension is integral when every element is integral. An algebraic integer is a complex number integral over Z. (Integral elements over a commutative ring and algebraic integers).

[L2]

A rational number is an algebraic integer if and only if it is an integer. (The rational algebraic integers are exactly the integers).

[L3]

Let F be a complete ordered field (def-complete-ordered-field). Then every a∈F with a≥0 has a unique s∈F with s≥0 and s2=a; we write s=a. Consequently the positive elements of F are exactly the nonzero squares: x>0 if and only if x=y2 for some y≠0. (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1L2L3givenalgebra

The number 2 is a root of the monic polynomial X2−2, and (1+5)/2 is a root of the monic polynomial X2−X−1; both are therefore algebraic integers.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra∎

The rational algebraic-integer criterion already excludes 1/2. Directly, a monic equation of degree n at 1/2 would, after multiplication by 2n, read 1+2an−1+⋯+2na0=0, whose left side is odd. This proves the stated claim.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources