How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: chain-homotopic maps are equal as chain maps
Statement
Every pair of chain-homotopic chain maps is equal as chain maps.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two-term complex in with , differential , and all other terms zero.
The statement refuted is: every pair of chain-homotopic chain maps is equal as chain maps.
A chain homotopy satisfies (A chain homotopy).
Passing to the homotopy category remembers only homotopy classes of maps (The homotopy category of chain complexes).
Refutation
Let and let . Define a degree- map by and all other components zero. A direct calculation gives so [L1] yields .
The maps and are not equal, because while . Thus [A1] is false. This is exactly why [L2] passes to homotopy classes instead of identifying homotopic maps inside itself.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)