How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A chain isomorphism is a chain homotopy equivalence
Statement
If a chain map admits a chain map with then is a chain homotopy equivalence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Chain maps and with and .
A homotopy equivalence is a chain map with a homotopy inverse up to homotopy (A chain homotopy equivalence).
Identities and composites of chain maps are chain maps (Identities and composites of chain maps are chain maps).
Proof
By [L2], the composites and are chain maps, and by hypothesis they are exactly the identity chain maps.
Exact equality implies chain homotopy, via the zero homotopies. Therefore is a homotopy inverse of , and [L1] shows that is a chain homotopy equivalence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)