Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A chain isomorphism is a chain homotopy equivalence

Statement

If a chain map f:C∙→D∙ admits a chain map g:D∙→C∙ with g∘f=1C,f∘g=1D, then f is a chain homotopy equivalence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Chain maps f:C∙→D∙ and g:D∙→C∙ with gf=1C and fg=1D.

[L1]

A homotopy equivalence is a chain map with a homotopy inverse up to homotopy (A chain homotopy equivalence).

[L2]

Identities and composites of chain maps are chain maps (Identities and composites of chain maps are chain maps).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L2given

By [L2], the composites gf and fg are chain maps, and by hypothesis they are exactly the identity chain maps.

2.1L1step 1.1algebra∎

Exact equality implies chain homotopy, via the zero homotopies. Therefore g is a homotopy inverse of f, and [L1] shows that f is a chain homotopy equivalence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources