How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homotopy equivalence is an equivalence relation on complexes
Statement
Chain homotopy equivalence is an equivalence relation on chain complexes.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Chain complexes .
A homotopy equivalence is a chain map with a homotopy inverse (A chain homotopy equivalence).
Chain homotopy is compatible with composition (Chain homotopy is compatible with addition and composition).
Proof
Every complex is homotopy equivalent to itself: the identity map is its own homotopy inverse, with the zero homotopies witnessing Symmetry is immediate by swapping a map with its chosen homotopy inverse.
If has homotopy inverse and has homotopy inverse , then and similarly by [L2]. Hence is again a homotopy equivalence. Together with step 1.1, this proves reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)