Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rank at one point need not determine nearby rank

Statement

False claim: if a smooth map has rank r at one point, then it has rank r on some neighbourhood of that point.

Facts & Assumptions

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], df0=0, so the rank at 0 is 0.

L1given
2.1

For every x0, the derivative is 2x0, so the rank at x is 1. Thus every neighbourhood of 0 contains points of rank 1.

L1step 1.1
3.1

Therefore the rank at 0 does not persist locally, which refutes the claim and shows why the extra maximal-rank hypothesis in [L2] matters.

L2step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources